Intelitics, the leading performance marketing and analytics platform provider, has been granted a licence by the Colorado Division of Gaming allowing it to work with licensed sportsbook operators in the state for the first time.Intelitics already holds licences in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, with Colorado the third with more to follow in the coming months.Intelitics provides online sportsbook and casino operators with a single platform that allows them to track, analyze and grow all acquisition partnerships and campaigns across web and mobile through access to real-time data which in turn allows them to unlock hidden revenue and boost ROI.Intelitics’ real-time data hub keeps media buyers, analysts and executives on the same page about spend and results. Operators can use one set of metrics to “slice and dice” media performance to discover what activity is delivering the best results.Powerful, streamlined reports provide full visibility into cross-channel interaction and the customer journey. A holistic view of costs v player value means operators can easily determine the most valuable media sources which improves revenue allocation modelling and inform media investment.CasinoAffiliatePrograms, the premier standalone iGaming specific Ad Network, which is powered and run by the Intelitics team, has delivered more than $70m in net game revenue through 150,000+ new depositing customers.Armed with its Colorado licence, Intelitics is now looking to work with licensed online sportsbook operators in the state in order to help them unlock the greatest value from their marketing activity.Allan Stone, CEO at Intelitics, said: “We are delighted to have secured a licence from the Colorado Division of Gaming allowing us to work with licensed sportsbook operators in the state for the very first time.”“As legal online sports betting continues to roll out across the US, there is a tremendous first mover advantage to be had but operators must ensure they are acquiring players at the right cost and through channels that deliver true value.”“Our cutting-edge platform provides the real-time data, insight and reporting that operators need to do just that across all of the channels they use to market to players. We look forward to working with sportsbooks licensed in the state of Colorado.”
คาสิโน ออนไลน์ จีคลับ
คาสิโน ออนไลน์ pantip
คาสิโน ออนไลน์ 777…
Starting from 16th February to 28th February, PokerBaazi will be hosting the Daily Cash Smash! 13 Days, daily leaderboards and prize pool of INR 21.45 Lakhs! The players can grind any of the three (NLHE/PLO-4/PLO-5) cash tables and all the chips won from the leaderboards will be withdrawable (separate for all three variants)!
All players will have a chance to win from a daily prize pool of INR 1.65 Lakhs! All you have to do is play the cash tables between 10:00 AM – 4:00 AM!
The Daily Leaderboard prize pool
5/10 & 10/25 (Texas Hold’Em): Daily 8k Leaderboard
1/2 & 2/5 (Texas Hold’Em): Daily 4k Leaderboard
25/50 & 50/100 (Texas Hold’Em): Daily 12k Leaderboard
5/10 & 10/25 (PLO-5): Daily 6k Leaderboard
25/50 & 50/100 (PLO-5): Daily 15k Leaderboard
1/2 & 2/5 (PLO-4): Daily 2k Leaderboard
10/25 & 25/50 (PLO-4): Daily 8k Leaderboard
It’s time to grind again on PokerBaazi, but this time, it’s going to have to be on the cash felts! Head over to the link below for more information about the Daily Cash Smash 2.0 and Leaderboards
For more information about the latest poker promotions and poker news, keep reading PokerShots!
Since the Alderney Gambling Commission’s role is vital in our industry and it is one of the primary governing bodies that we rely on for the regulation of online casinos, we will now give you an overview of the main features of AGCC.
We’ll start with a short history and definition of what AGCC is. We’ll then go through its activities and responsibilities. We’ll also mention some notable casinos that have an AGCC licence. Finally, we’ll let you know how you can contact AGCC and what it can do to help you.
AGCC – What Is It?
Established in 2000, Alderney Gambling Control Commission (AGCC) is an independent governing body that regulates iGaming operators on behalf of the States of Alderney. Together with the UK Gambling Commission and the Malta Gaming Agency, it ensures that an operator offers players the chance to play at a safe online casino.
Name: Alderney Gambling Control Commission
Address: St Anne’s House, Queen Elizabeth II Street, Alderney, Channel Islands, GY9 3TB
Phone: +44 (0)1481 825500
Alderney Gambling Control Commission – What It Does
AGCC is authorised to issue licences and certificates. There are two types of electronic gambling licences. The first has to do with player registration and verification, contracts and funds. The second one has to do with the management of gambling platforms. These two types are intricately connected.
Alderney Gaming Control Commission has set a clear goal. Its main objective is to defend and improve its name as a first-tier regulatory jurisdiction. It works towards that goal by ensuring the following:
All gambling is conducted honestly and fairly.
Online gambling, including its management, operation, and funding, is free from criminal influence.
Strict regulation and monitoring protect the young and vulnerable people.
Moreover, AGCC takes up compliance testing of licensees. To perform regular technical checks, AGCC Alderney works closely with certified testing laboratories, or test houses, around the world. Finally, AGCC provides players and operators with transparency. On the website, you can find the names of the licensees but also the names of the applicants.
Alderney Gambling Control Commission Casinos
Since the Alderney Gambling Control Commission (AGCC) is a key issuer of certificates and licences in the online gaming industry, you will often come across its name when looking for the best gambling sites in the UK. Here are some of the top online casino operators that proudly display the logo of AGCC on their websites as proof they have a valid licence from the Commission.
Why Play at an AGCC Casino?
But why should you choose one of the Alderney Gambling Control Commission casinos? There are many reasons. First of all, you should never even consider playing at unregulated casinos. AGCC is one of the best in regulating online gaming sites and promoting responsible gambling. That gives players a lot of advantages. The Alderney logo on the casino website guarantees:
Player Protection: Operators are required to comply with the data protection Act and handle sensitive information properly. Also, those that are vulnerable and the young are paid special attention. Finally, player funds are kept separate from casino funds, thus preserving player money no matter what.
Fair Gaming: Online casinos undergo routine equipment checks by licensed technical laboratories that work with the Alderney Commission. The regular technical supervision and testing aim to ensure all games are fair and that the Random Number Generator (RNG) is indeed random.
Operator Accountability: If there were no accountability, online casinos would do whatever they please, and players would suffer losses. However, Alderney Gambling Control Commission casinos stand by their word. Should an operator stray from the act of conduct, any player could get in touch with AGCC – contact them or file a complaint.
Apart from the AGCC transparency that we’ve mentioned, the Alderney Gambling Commission is easy to reach by phone, fax, email, web form, or mail. Choose your preferred method of communication to request more information about the activities of the organisation or to file a complaint.
Did you know that AGCC Alderney would like to help you in your communication with the online casinos they regulate? For example, if you think you’ve been mistreated, but the casino operator doesn’t respond to your messages, contact Alderney.
Indeed, since one of the goals of the Alderney Gambling Commission is to ensure that players are treated fairly and gaming is conducted honestly, you could rely on the help of the governing body. Contact Alderney – file a complaint – with regards to any case in which you believe a licensee, that is an online casino, has breached any of the provisions, as stipulated by AGCC.
FAQ About Alderney Gambling Commission
We have tried to present the Alderney Gambling Control Commission (AGCC) the best way possible without getting into too much detail. We’ve explained what AGCC is and what it does. We’ve also made clear how the Alderney Commission could help you in your communication with online casinos. Finally, we have given you the names of top AGCC casinos. We’ll now answer the top questions players have about AGCC.
✔️ What does AGCC stand for?
AGCC stands for Alderney Gambling Control Commission. It is one of the most respectable regulatory organisations in iGaming. The AGCC works closely with the UK Gambling Commission to maintain and ensure a safe online gaming experience for UK players.
📑 What does the Alderney Commission do?
The Alderney Gambling Control Commission (AGCC) issues certificates and licences to casino operators that comply with the Commission’s stringent rules for player safety, game fairness, and protection of the young and vulnerable people. It also ensures that operators stay compliant by regular testing.
🃏 What makes AGCC casinos safe?
If an operator displays the AGCC logo on their website, that gaming site a safe place where you can play real money games and expect fair, honest results, thanks to a truly random RNG. Alderney Gambling Control Commission casinos are an excellent choice for UK players.
🎰 What are the advantages of playing at an AGCC casino site?
You are probably wondering what the advantages of AGCC casinos are. Since the Alderney Gambling Commission works to ensure the UK online gambling experience is at its best, AGCC casino sites boast many features of excellence, such as player protection, fair gaming, and operator accountability.
🎲 What can the AGCC do for players?
AGCC has UK players’ best interests at heart, including but not limited to player safety and comfort. So, if you have a problem that an AGCC casino refuses to solve, you can go ahead and use the AGCC contact form or another method of communication to flag the problem. Alternatively, you can file an official complaint.
Glorious Guardians is going to be a joint title, from Ash Gaming and Playtech, one of the 2021 slot games that will be coming out from this developer. The base for this one comes from China and from its amazing creatures specifically. We see the concept both in its design and in its utilization of Twin Symbols during its major feature.Glorious Guardians gives 5×3 reels. The slot will settle up to 2,000x the stake through its fixed bonanzas. It’s major features are the Wild, free spins with Twin Symbols and scattersBetting and Prizes A few fixed bonanzas can be delivered by Glorious Guardians. These are the Mega Jackpot of 2,000x the stake, Major Jackpot of 200x the stake and Mini Jackpot of 50x the stake.Glorious Guardians Slot Features In spite of the fact that extremely basic for an uncommon feature, the Wild image is as yet going to have a significant effect over the long haul, and for some it might simply do what’s necessary to transform a losing meeting into a productive one. The manner in which it works is standard, as a substitute that you can utilize while framing new blends, given that you get different images which are required.The huge feature of Glorious Guardians will depend on the free spins however. When you get those set off, you will locate that the first and fifth reels will have coordinating images on them, with the guardians covering both. During the free spins, this can make it simpler to shape 5 image mixes of that kind.Theme and Design Obviously, there is a major spotlight on the creatures mentioned in the story of China and I love how Playtech and Ash Gaming managed it design wise. We’re taking a look at a background picture showing palaces and sculptures of these creatures on the two sides while the reels mark the outer reels with red and the center ones are kept separate.Images will give you pictures of the Royals at first, beautiful but standard choices in any case. You at that point proceed onward to images with the creatures (Dragons in green or gold, White Tigers, Phoenix Bird Turtles) and the feature triggers (Wild).ConclusionGlorious Guardian is generally a good slot machine with nice features, so you can try it out.
ts911 คาสิโน ออนไลน์…
A title like Silver Trails offers a Wild West theme. Notwithstanding this well known theme, this present Novomatic’s slot has 5 reels, 3 rows and 243 different ways to win. In spite of these features, the game has various and interesting things on offer.The Wilds and Scatters are essential for the combination and they carry multipliers with them just as a Jackpot Feature which allows you to win one of 4 different bonanzas. A bet feature is likewise available.Betting and Prizes Much the same as in most slot games, you’ll need to match identical images to get prizes. You can get 3 images in a combo and win a prize. Be that as it may, you can likewise get 4 or 5 of them and improve prize. As said earlier, this game allows you to win one out of 4 bonanzas. They are the Mini, Minor, Major, and Grand bonanzas. Silver Trails has a lot to offer.Silver Trails’ Slot Features Since the royal card images are very famous you’ll see them in this title too. They are joined by the 10 image just as images that fit the theme. These are the revolver and bullet, the cowboy and others.Normally, there are some exceptional images in the combination. The Wild is the first and it seems stacked on reels 2 and 4. Other than this one, you additionally have the Silver Star image which is the Scatter one. At the point when it lands on reels 1, 3, or 5 you’ll get a multiplier that equals the sum on the stars that landed.Also, the Scatter is liable for another feature too. However, for that, you’ll need at least 6 Scatters to trigger this feature. When this occurs, the images that set off the feature remain and place, and you get 3 Bonus spins. The counter moves to 3 when you land another Scatter.On the off chance that you are able to cover the whole reels with the Silver Star image, you’ll get the Grand Jackpot. Then again, you can get any of the other 3. Strong multipliers are additionally important for this feature and they can get as high as 20x your stake.The last feature that allows you to increase your rewards is the Gamble feature. In any case, it’s a dangerous feature as you can lose them on the off chance that you don’t play it right.Theme and Design With Silver Trails slot fans are given another title that is motivated by the Wild West. The images and the background of the game look stunning and the game mechanics are impeccable. At long last, the game’s engineers didn’t mix out the opportunity to make this a mobile-friendly game too.ConclusionSilver Trails takes you to the Wild West and allows you to earn huge prizes. Because of the Jackpot feature you can leave with 1 out of 4 magnificent bonanzas. On the other hand, you can try our the bet feature and appreciate the multipliers that come with the Silver Stars. Wilds are in the combination too.
เป็นการยากที่จะจินตนาการถึงอุตสาหกรรมการพนันวานิลลาที่ใหญ่กว่าที่บางคนต้องการสร้างในสหราชอาณาจักรเมื่อประเทศเกิดจาก Brexit และสามารถยืนได้ด้วยสองเท้าของตัวเองดูเหมือนว่าใครจะไม่สนใจที่จะตัดแหล่งรายได้ สิ่งสำคัญที่สุดคือบางคนพยายามอย่างหนักเพื่อให้มีอำนาจในการส่งเสริมอุตสาหกรรมการพนันด้วยข้อ จำกัด กฎหมายข้อ จำกัด และข้อ จำกัด ต่างๆมาโดยตลอด เจ้าหน้าที่บางคนต้องตื่นขึ้นมาในตอนกลางคืนเพื่อพยายามคิดว่าจะไปเล่นการพนันได้อย่างไร ในการเคลื่อนไหวใหม่เหล่านี้สภาการเดิมพันและการเล่นเกม (BGC) ได้ใช้กฎใหม่สำหรับสโมสรฟุตบอลที่ป้องกันไม่ให้พวกเขาใช้โซเชียลมีเดียเพื่อพูดคุยเกี่ยวกับการพนันกีฬา แนะนำวิธีการจัดการใหม่ ๆ ในเรื่องนี้สโมสรไม่ควรใช้บัญชีโซเชียลมีเดียเพื่อส่งเสริมการบริจาคการพนันและผู้จัดการการพนันกีฬา รหัสใหม่จะมีผลตั้งแต่วันที่ 1 มีนาคมและจะป้องกันการใช้คำกระตุ้นการตัดสินใจหรือเชื่อมโยงเว็บไซต์การพนันกับทวีตคาร์บอนจากคลับและจะป้องกันไม่ให้สโมสรเข้าถึงการแสดงประเภทโบนัสที่เหมาะสมและเกมหรือการพนันในทวีตสด ข้อแตกต่างเพียงอย่างเดียวคือหากสโมสรอ้างว่าสั่งให้ไม่มีใครอายุต่ำกว่า 18 ปีเห็นสิ่งนี้จะเป็นไปไม่ได้หากโซเชียลมีเดียเช่น Facebook และ Twitter ได้รับอนุญาตให้เข้าสังคม ความกังวลว่าผู้ใช้โซเชียลมีเดียและปัญหาการพนันบางรายอาจ“ อารมณ์เสีย” หากเห็นข้อมูลการพนันขณะเรียกดูฟีดโซเชียลมีเดีย หากเป็นเช่นนั้นโฆษณาประเภทใดก็ตามที่มีอาหารขยะอาจถูกแบนเนื่องจากมีแนวโน้มว่าผู้ที่มีปัญหาร้ายแรงจะได้รับผลกระทบ มิฉะนั้นอาจไม่อนุญาตให้โปรโมตวันวาเลนไทน์เนื่องจากอาจเป็นปัญหาสำหรับผู้ที่เลิกรากัน ระบบการกำกับดูแลใหม่หลังจากการริเริ่มที่นำเสนอเมื่อปีที่แล้วได้รับการออกแบบมาเพื่อลดการพนัน ผู้ให้บริการเกม “ฟรี” เริ่มโปรโมตโฆษณาทางทีวีและวิทยุ COVID-19 และตาม BGC ได้เปลี่ยนนโยบายการโฆษณาเพื่อเพิ่มยอดขายในผู้ที่อายุต่ำกว่า 18 ปี การดำเนินการใหม่นี้เป็นส่วนเสริมและอาจไม่ใช่ครั้งสุดท้ายและบริจิดซิมมอนด์ประธานบีจีซีกล่าวว่า “สโมสรฟุตบอลเป็นส่วนสำคัญของเวทีกีฬาของประเทศนี้ตามด้วยผู้คนหลายล้านคนที่มีอายุมากกว่าโซเชียลมีเดีย สมาชิกไม่มีสิทธิ์เล่นการพนันที่มีอายุต่ำกว่า 18 ปีเนื่องจากเป็นธุรกิจที่เราเข้าใจว่าเด็ก ๆ มีความเสี่ยงในการเล่นการพนันบนอินเทอร์เน็ตโซเชียลมีเดียแนวทางใหม่ของเราเข้าใจมาตรฐานที่ควรใช้กับสโมสรฟุตบอลเมื่อพวกเขาโพสต์ การโปรโมตการพนันบนโซเชียลมีเดียและฉันหวังว่าพวกเขาจะถูกนำไปใช้โดยเร็วที่สุด ”
คาสิโน ออนไลน์ ได้เงินจริง
Tyrant King Megaways เล่น 6 วงล้อรับ 117,649 Megaways ในระหว่างการหมุนปกติ แต่ในทำนองเดียวกันจะได้รับมากถึง 200,704 วิธีที่แตกต่างกันเมื่อมีโอกาสได้รับฟรีสปิน นอกจากฟรีสปินแล้วยังมีรีลแบบเรียงซ้อนตัวคูณการขยายตัวไวด์และรีสปิน เงินปันผลสามารถยอมรับได้มากโดยมีการเดิมพัน 10,000x และ 96% RTP การเดิมพันและเงินรางวัล $ 0.20 เป็นเดิมพันต่ำสุดสำหรับผู้เล่นส่วนใหญ่และเป็นจำนวนเงินต่ำสุดที่ Tyrant King Megaways อนุญาต ในทางกลับกันการเดิมพันสูงสุดที่ใช้คือสูงถึง $ 20 และการชนะครั้งใหญ่คือโอกาสในสล็อตที่ต้องพึ่งพา Megaways อย่างสม่ำเสมอซึ่งเป็นแรงจูงใจสำคัญที่ทำให้เกมเหล่านี้ได้รับความนิยม อย่างไรก็ตามไม่ใช่เรื่องง่ายเพราะเป็นเรื่องที่คาดเดาไม่ได้อย่างมาก ทุกสิ่งที่พิจารณา Bonanza RTP ที่มีสัดส่วนการเดิมพันสูงถึง 10,000 ครั้งถูกกำหนดไว้ที่ 96% คุณสมบัติสล็อต Tyrant King Megaways ที่เกี่ยวข้องกับระบบ Megaways ขึ้นอยู่กับจำนวนวงล้อคงที่ (6 ในกรณีนี้) แต่สำหรับภาพจำนวนเท่าใดก็ได้ (2-7 ระหว่างการหมุนปกติ) วิธีนี้ช่วยให้คุณได้รับรางวัลมากถึง 117,649 วิธีในระหว่างการหมุนปกติ เมื่อเกิดการรวมกันรีลแบบเรียงซ้อนจะถูกทริกเกอร์เพื่อลบรูปภาพที่ชนะและเพิ่มรูปภาพอื่น สิ่งนี้สามารถจุดประกายชัยชนะและน้ำตกได้มากขึ้น ฟังก์ชันสปินและ Respins จะทำงาน มันให้รางวัลสไตล์ Hold and Win แก่คุณด้วยการตอบสนอง 3 ครั้งในระหว่างนี้คุณจะต้องได้รับไวลด์พิเศษสำหรับวงล้อของคุณ สามารถแสดงเฉพาะตำแหน่งที่ไม่เหมาะสมและว่างเปล่าในโหมดนี้ คุณรวบรวมการตั้งค่าเสริมและการตั้งค่าใหม่ที่อาจปรากฏขึ้น หากวงล้อถูกปิดทับมันจะกลายเป็นไวด์ตัวคูณ การตอบสนองจะถูกรีเซ็ตเมื่อคุณได้รับไวลด์ใหม่และเมื่อสิ้นสุดคุณสมบัตินี้คุณจะได้รับไวลด์ทั้งหมดที่ใช้เป็นส่วนประกอบของส่วนผสมใหม่ในเกมหลัก คอมโบทั้งหมดสูงสุด 6 ไวลด์จะจ่ายที่ 50 เท่าของเงินเดิมพันและจะได้รับสูงสุด 15 รอบเมื่อแสดงไข่ไดโนเสาร์ที่กระจัดกระจายมากถึง 6 ใบ มีการเพิ่มรูปภาพหนึ่งบรรทัดเพื่อเพิ่มพื้นที่ในเกมดังนั้นตอนนี้คุณสามารถชนะ 200,704 วิธีต่างๆ คุณสมบัติอื่นรวมถึงตัวคูณการขยายซึ่งจะเพิ่มขึ้น 1 สำหรับแต่ละน้ำตกใหม่ ธีมและการออกแบบเราย้อนกลับไปในสมัยที่ไดโนเสาร์เดินทางและควบคุมโลกใบนี้ ทีเร็กซ์จะเป็นดาราในป่าและไข่ไดโนเสาร์จะเป็นตัวแทนของการวางไข่ ภาพมาตรฐาน ได้แก่ Adventurer, Cavewoman, Three Kinds of Dinosaurs และภาพวาด 10 ถึง A Royals เมื่อถึงจุดนั้น Jurassic Park ก็อยู่ในใจเนื่องจากเป็นการผสมผสานระหว่างยุคก่อนประวัติศาสตร์และยุคปัจจุบันและไม่สามารถหาได้จากที่อื่น บทสรุป Tyrant King Megaway นั้นน่าสนใจด้วยคุณสมบัติใหม่ที่เราสามารถทดลองใช้ได้แล้ว ฉันรู้และสนุกกับมัน การชนะสูงสุดของเงินเดิมพัน 10,000x ไม่ใช่เรื่องพิเศษในสล็อต Megaways แต่มันก็ดูดีมากที่ทุกอย่างเท่าเทียมกัน
Steve at the WSOP Final Table. Image © PokerNews
This is a “Retro Blog” from 11/8/2010 discussing the time I spent coaching 2009 WSOP Main Event final table member, Steven Begleiter.
Back when I initially made this post, I was a terrible writer. I decided to clean up the grammar and fix the typos. Believe it or not, but I used to be (and still am to some extent) a sloppy writer.
I have endless problems proofreading my own writing. I constantly struggle to not overlook countless minor, but obvious, mistakes in all forms of writing including books, blogs, twitter posts, emails, and text messages. Perhaps my brain is broken. Please know I try my best!
Getting the Job
Ylon Schwartz and I have never revealed that we spent three months coaching Steven Begleiter through his preparation for the final table of the 2009 WSOP Main Event.
I was initially introduced to Steve through a 2+2 forum member, Ben Lambert, who knew me from back in my sit n’ go days, where I had a considerable amount of success. Of course, my live success also got me on the radar. Given all final tables are essentially sit n’ go tournaments with funny payouts and stack sizes, he thought I would be an excellent candidate to transform Steve into a player with a better than average shot at taking home the bracelet.
It is worth noting that Steve won his way into the 2009 Main Event through a fairly high stakes local league. Ben also participates in this league, which is how he knows Steve.
Ylon Schwartz. Image © PokerNews
I should mention now that Steve is an extremely intelligent guy. I now look up to him as a mentor. He possesses an important life ability that many lack. He is aware that there are many things he doesn’t know and he isn’t afraid to seek help when he thinks he can improve.
Steve knew he wanted to hire a coach so he interviewed lots poker professionals to find the best fit. He narrowed his search down to me and Ylon Schwartz, a chess master who final tabled the WSOP Main Event in 2008. I had no experience with Ylon but shortly after meeting him, it became clear he had a solid grasp of poker.
I was fairly sure Steve was going to pick Ylon, mainly because both he and Ylon live in New York. At the time, I lived across the country in Vegas. I did some negotiating and succeeded in getting the job split between the two of us, which worked out quite well.
I ended up flying to New York three times, once for our initial interview and two other times to spend long weekends coaching Steve. During these weekends, we discussed and played poker constantly. Steve is a super busy guy with a hectic job and a full family life. Despite that, he always spent our time together working hard and quickly absorbed everything I taught him.
Most people, especially when it comes to poker, are stuck in their ways. They refuse to believe they might actually be bad at poker. Steve was the opposite, realizing that Ylon and I were on a different level than he was. He learned a lot from us because he had an open mind and wanted to learn.
Our First Trip
After our initial interview, we decided it would be a good idea for Steve to fly to Vegas and drive with me to Los Angeles to play the WPT event at the Bicycle Casino. We discussed poker during the entire car ride. I think we both learned a ton. I ended up cashing in the event but Steve ended up taking 9th place, which was really impressive considering the field was tough and we had just started working on his game.
Steve with fellow WSOP final tablist Kevin Schaffel at the Legends of Poker WPT event. Image © PokerListings
He claimed the advice I gave him allowed him to avoid going broke twice in the tournament whereas before our lessons, he would have busted early on the first day. That is a good thing! A lot of what I taught him was to control the size of the pot with his good, but not amazing hands, such as top pair with a marginal kicker. You will find it is quite difficult for your bets to get called on three streets by hands worse than top pair with a bad kicker. This means you need to check them at some point. You will find that checking often induces your opponent to either over value his worse made hand or try to bluff you off your “obvious” weak holding. By checking, you extract additional value you would normally miss by betting.
I learned from Steve that most amateur players simply do not pay attention to stack sizes. The concept that each stack size requires a vastly different strategy isn’t something they are aware of. Poker requires a very different strategy when you have 20 big blinds than when you have 100 big blinds. We worked hard on these two concepts and I think he became a much better poker player almost overnight. Steve was sad to take 9th place, but at the same time, he realized it was a great accomplishment.
Working Hard at Home
Back in New York, we ran numerous simulations where we would set up stacks according to the final table stack sizes and try to match up each stack with a player whose playing styles were similar to those of the actual final table players. Steve did reasonably well in most of these sessions, so that was encouraging.
After our first full NYC weekend, Steve decided to play the WSOP Europe. He was one of the chip leaders early in the first day but ran into a few unavoidable situations and was eliminated. While going broke is rarely a good thing, the fact that he is clearly capable of gathering chips means he always has a chance to win. You would much rather have large swings than break even in a poker tournament because in order to win, you have to get all of the chips. Hanging out, waiting for premium hands, is usually not a good idea, especially if your opponents play well.
Before meeting Steve, I assumed I would have to work hard on getting him in good physical shape, as most poker players are not in shape at all. Luckily, Steve was already in excellent shape. There is nothing worse than being technically sound at poker but crashing late in a session due to poor fitness. Once he made the final table, he was frequently in the gym and worked out much harder than I expected. I was, and still am, incredibly proud of his preparation, both on and off the felt.
I also made a point to ensure he was on the proper sleep schedule. If you get tired at midnight but you happen to be required to play until 4am, the wheels could easily fall off. I believe getting Steve on the proper sleep schedule also helped set him up for success.
That’s enough talk about the preparation. On to the final table!
Tackling the WSOP Main Event Final Table
Steve had one of the worst seats at the table, having Eric Buchman, the only other “known” world class player with a ton of chips, on his left. Also to Steve’s left was Joe Cada, who we assumed would play his short stack well, given that he had a ton of online experience. We assumed Antonie Saout, Jeff Schulman, Kevin Schaffel, and Darvin Moon would play fairly tight. We thought James Akenhead, Phil Ivey, and Joe Cada would look to mix it up a bit and try to double their short stacks. We assumed Buchman would try to go after Steve, due to his position, with numerous light calls and reraises.
You may be surprised that we did not assess Ivey as much of a threat, at least as the chips currently sat. Steve had position on Ivey, which automatically gave Steve a huge edge. Also, Ivey didn’t have many chips, meaning he would have to double up a few times before he got in contention. It is fairly difficult, even for Phil Ivey, to double up a few times. In all of the simulations we ran, I (playing in Phil Ivey’s seat) never really got too far off the ground. Starting with a small stack is a huge disadvantage.
It turned out we were generally correct in all of our assumptions except that Saout wasn’t too tight and Ivey was super tight. Early in the day, it looked like Schaffel was going to double through Buchman, which would have made the table much better for Steve because chips flow to the left and Steve had position on Schaffel, but his A-A couldn’t beat K-K.
This was the first crushing blow to our day that few people seemed to notice. It is really bad when a loose, aggressive player on your left gets lots of chips because he will use them to constantly apply pressure on you. That would have been fine if Steve could have made a strong trapping hand, but, if you have ever played poker, you will find you cannot rely on making strong hands.
A Few Minor Missteps
As for Steve’s play at the final table, I was completely satisfied with all of his decisions except two that came up near the end of the day.
In the first one, he raised with 8c-7c and Saout, who was certainly playing the best out of anyone else at the table, reraised from the big blind. Saout had been going after Steve a little, although not too much. I don’t recall the exact stack sizes but I think Steve had 44,000,000 and Saout had 23,000,000. The blinds were 250,000/500,000. Steve raised to 1,500,000 and Saout reraised to 4,500,000. Steve elected to call, which is fairly loose and likely bad given Saout’s relatively short effective stack size. Saout checked on the 9h-8h-3c flop and Steve bet 5,250,000. I really dislike this bet because if Saout decided to go all-in, Steve would be getting decent odds to call with a fairly marginal hand. In general, you do not want to bet an amount that makes your decision difficult. You want to set yourself up to have easy decisions. A smaller bet or a check from Steve would have been much better. Anyway, Saout did push all-in and Steve made what was likely a “correct” call. Saout turned over a flush draw and won when a heart came on the turn.
It worked out pretty well for Joe Cada. Image © PokerNews
If you watched the coverage of this event prior to the final table, you likely know that Steve loves calling reraises with suited connectors. We worked hard to cut that out of his game, especially against good players who will not blindly stack off to you or when you are not getting large implied odds, but he still decided to take a flop in this situation. Despite that “error”, he got his money in with about 50% equity, so I suppose it wasn’t too bad. It is rarely a bad thing to be in a flipping spot where if you lose, you will still have a decent stack and if you win, you will have a gigantic chip lead. Losing this hand was the second major thing that went wrong for Steve.
The next hand Steve lost may appear to be fairly minor, but it had huge consequences, as it helped determine the champion. Joe Cada raised to 2.5 big blinds out of his 20 big blind stack from first position and Steve called from the small blind with As-3s. The flop came Ah-Jc-2s. Steve elected to be bet into Joe, a move which I despise. Cada decided to call the lead. They checked down the turn and the river, giving Steve a tiny pot. I would have much preferred to see him check-call with the intention of inducing Cada to bluff off his stack. Instead of having a realistic chance of inducing Cada to bluff by showing weakness, Steve won almost nothing.
The final bad thing that happened to Steve was actually a standard bad beat. Steve raised to 2.5 big blinds out of his 35 big blind stack from middle position with Q-Q and Darvin Moon pushed all-in from one of the blinds with A-Q. Steve, of course, called instantly. The flop came X-X-X-X-A and Steve was out. He busted in 6th place, collecting $1,587,160.
Life Goes On
Steve giving an exit interview. Image © PokerNews
Steve took his loss exceptionally well and gave a few excellent exit interviews. I do not know if I would have maintained my composure after running fairly bad during the entire final table. He is a strong man.
Steve was an absolute joy to work with. I don’t think anyone else at the final table would have been a better student. Even though he made a few mistakes, none of which turned out to be too costly in terms of equity, I firmly believe he made significantly fewer mistakes than he would have without coaching. If Steve had a desire to make it on the professional poker circuit, I am confident he could. That being said, he has an awesome job and life, which he has no desire to leave, so he will remain a world class weekend warrior.
When I first got the job to coach Steve, I was happy simply to get the job but I am now honored to have a friend for life. Hopefully someone decides to take the plunge with me again next year. I loved the experience. Better yet, I will try to make the final table myself.
If you enjoyed this post, please share it with your friends. Thank you for reading.
Odds courtesy of OddsShark.comThere are just two teams left in college basketball that are unbeaten, and they are the top-ranked Gonzaga Bulldogs of the West Coast Conference and No. 2 Baylor Bears of the Big 12. Neither program has won a national championship in the sport, but they are the two clear favorites to cut down the nets on April 5 at Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis. Selection Sunday is March 14, with the First Four taking place on March 18.Gonzaga (+275) probably will reach the NCAA Tournament – which this season due to COVID is being played entirely in the greater Indianapolis area – unbeaten simply because the level of competition it faces in the WCC is rather weak overall. The Zags have two regular-season games left and both are at home: Thursday against Saint Mary’s and Saturday against San Diego. Gonzaga has won 47 straight games at home and 24 in a row overall dating to last season.The Bulldogs lead the nation in scoring (93.1 ppg) and shooting (55.1 percent). They are essentially a lock to be a No. 1 seed in the NCAA Tournament. Gonzaga reached the national title game in 2017 and lost to North Carolina. The Zags were the No. 1 overall seed in the NCAA men’s basketball selection committee’s mock bracket reveal Saturday.Baylor (+300) has played a tougher schedule than Gonzaga simply because the Big 12 is so much better than the West Coast Conference – the Bears and Zags were supposed to play on December 5 at a neutral site but it was postponed for COVID reasons. Baylor hasn’t taken the court since February 2 due to COVID issues in the program. It reached the national title game way back in 1948 but lost to a powerhouse Kentucky team coached by the legendary Adolph Rupp.The Big Ten hasn’t had a national champion since Michigan State in 2000 but has four legitimate contenders this season in Michigan (+800), Illinois (+1300), Ohio State (+1400) and Iowa (+1600).The Wolverines returned Sunday from a nearly month-long COVID break and won at then-No. 21 Wisconsin. The Hawkeyes have arguably the country’s most dominant player in senior Luka Garza, who ranks first nationally in scoring at 24.5 ppg. Last season, Garza was recognized as the National Player of the Year by six national media outlets and certainly will get similar recognition this year.
คาสิโน ออนไลน์ ได้เงินจริง
That is a lot of people!© PokerNews
The 2014 WSOP introduced the concept of the “Monster Stack” tournament, which provides each player with a much larger starting stack than normal.
While it is a well-known fact among professionals that they have a larger edge with a larger stack compared to a smaller stack, the Monster Stack event was one of the largest of the series, attracting a whopping 7,862 players.
When I posted about my confusion on twitter, I was instantly faced with lots of people spewing blatant ignorance. Somehow over the last few years, amateurs got the idea stuck in their head that deep stacks are good for them!
In this blog post, I will explain why the Monster Stack event is bad for amateurs and what they can do to find events that give them the best chance for success.
Before I proceed, please know I am only trying to spread the truth. While it has become clear to me that countless people blindly believe incorrect concepts, if you are an amateur player who cares about money and you seek out deep stacked events consisting of a few professionals, you will quickly find your bankroll is gone.
Playing for Fun
The main reason most amateur players seem to favor deep stacked events is because they allow for “more play.” To them, this means they get to sit at the table for a longer period of time before going broke. This is, of course, correct, because they can lose more hands before becoming handcuffed by a short stack. Compared to normal $1,500 WSOP events, where you are often crippled after losing one marginally significant pot, having a larger stack in terms of big blinds will allow for longer periods of play at the table.
That isn’t a lot of chips!
I want to make it clear that sitting at the table for a long period of time should not be your goal when you enter a poker tournament, assuming you care about money. If you are only playing for entertainment, to complete a “bucket list” item, or for a story to tell your friends, this article is not for you. Those people value experience over money. There is nothing wrong with that at all. However, I try to help people who want to improve at poker, not those who blatantly do not care about knowledge and self-improvement.
In all aspects of life, you can usually find a way to trade money for experience. Most of the time for lunch, I have blended up spinach, kale, parsley, and other vegetables. Yum! However, on some days, I will go out to an overly expensive restaurant and eat fairly unhealthy (compared to raw veggies) food. When I go to a restaurant, I am voluntarily trading money, time, and health for a nice experience and pleasant tastes in my mouth. While I don’t do this too often, perhaps once per week, I enjoy it and will continue to do it.
This guy is clearly having fun. © PokerListings
I think most amateur poker players who are playing poker for the experience view the Monster Stack event similarly to how I view going out to a fancy restaurant for lunch. There is nothing at all wrong with that. Trying to teach me about nutrition and getting a good value when it comes to dining out at lunch is futile because both of those things are not my goals in the least bit, just like some amateurs’ goals are not to win money in the long run.
I am not on the same page as those players looking for an experience at the poker table because we have vastly different goals. If I want to save money, time, and health, I eat spinach. If I want to spend money, relax, and eat cake, I go to lunch. If you want to maximize your equity, especially if it is certain to be negative (the goal, perhaps, should be to lose less), you should play shallow stacked events. If you want to play poker with the pros, sit at a poker table for a long time, and not instantly go broke, you should play deep stacked events. However, you must realize that you are sacrificing monetary equity for experience equity.
Of course, it is possible to have the best of both worlds, playing deep stacked with an edge, which is what the pros do, but you must accept that you will have to spend tons of time away from the table studying and at the table practicing to develop your skills. Most amateurs refuse to study away from the table and do not have adequate time to spend at the table. If you care about money, you must be realistic with yourself about your goals and your commitment to the game.
My problem occurs when someone tells me “I am playing the monster stack because the deep stack gives me an edge” and also “I play one poker tournament per year.” It is almost impossible for that player to be good at the game. I am simply being honest and fighting ignorance. Sometimes the truth hurts.
Playing for Money
If you are playing with the intention of trying to not lose your buy-in, you must be perfectly fine with busting out at any point in a tournament. Some of my best days of the summer are when I bust out of within an hour because I get to take the rest of the day off. I would much rather bust one hour into a tournament than eight hours into it, assuming I am not in the money.
It is easy to make bad decisions with a huge stack. © PokerListings
Most amateur players use the extra time afforded to them by having numerous big blinds by waiting around for premium hands. The problem with this is that they often cultivate an overly tight image and fail to get action with their strong holdings. Waiting around for a nut hand is useless if you only win small pots. In order to succeed in deep stacked poker, you have to get at least a touch out of line and let your opponents know you aren’t playing with only the nuts. If they think you are capable of bluffing, you will get paid off much more often.
As an example, in the Monster Stack event, which I made a point to play due to my gigantic perceived edge, someone raised to 3 big blinds and a guy who had yet to reraise over the course of eight hours all of a sudden reraised to 12 big blinds from the button out of his 75 big blind stack. I looked down and found Q-Q. I folded it with little thought. If my opponent was even the least bit active, I would have happily doubled him up. Instead, I lost nothing. I was not surprised at all to see him turn up A-A. For the record, in tournaments with strong players who play at least marginally aggressively, I don’t think I have ever open folded Q-Q in my life. My opponent’s play cost him around $1,000 in equity and he didn’t even realize it. He was simply happy to win the pot.
Lots of other amateurs claimed they don’t like playing short stacked because they are forced to “flip”. While getting it all-in with around 50% equity is never ideal, you will find that if you can get all-in with around 55% equity or more you will crush the competition in the long run. Believe it or not, it is difficult to do once stacks get shallow.
I will demonstrate this concept using oversimplified, but hopefully enlightening, math. In these simulations, you are forced to go all-in every hand in a heads up match. Notice in an actual poker tournament, when you get all-in, it will frequently be against one player, which is a similar situation. You must recognize that if you are overly focused on getting your money in good, you will often be blinding off, making the math much worse for you because when you win, you will not bust your opponents. This gives them the opportunity to run their stack back up, occasionally busting you despite you initially winning almost all of their chips.
Hopefully you know that if everyone has a 50% chance of winning each all-in, in an eight-person heads-up tournament, everyone will win 12.5% of the time. However, if one guy has a 55% chance of winning his flips, meaning each of his opponents has 45% chance against him and 50% against everyone else, the player with 55% will win the tournament a 16.6% of the time, which provides a hefty 32% return on investment. This is because each of his opponents will only win 11.9% of the time.
If instead of only eight people, there were 64, the player with 55% will win 2.77% of the time, which might sound minuscule, but is huge compared to everyone else, who will only win 1.54% of the time. In that event, the player with 55% will have a 77% return on investment, which is more than most top tournament players expect to have in a tournament with many more people. Hopefully you immediately recognize that if you can consistently get your money in good, you will have a larger return on investment as the field size increases.
It is important to realize that when playing deep stacked, good players do not get all-in against an amateur without a hand that can reasonably beat good, but not amazing, postflop hands, such as A-A on 9-7-4-2. It might be hard to believe, but against someone who is a good poker player, you do not want to get all-in with most one pair hands in most situations when you have more than 150 big blinds.
To make matters worse for the amateurs, pros slowly grind up their stacks with minimal risk by stealing lots of pots that do not belong to them. This allows the pros to get all-in as a significant favorite with more chips than their opponents, killing the amateur’s chances in the long run. Notice in a 64 person flipping tournament, if a really good pro has 60% equity and everyone else is neutral, he will win 4.67% of the time with a gigantic 199% return on investment. If instead, all of the stacks are super short, perhaps the best a pro can hope for is to have around 53% equity on average, cutting his return on investment to 41%, giving the amateurs a realistic shot to win in the short run.
This is why deep stacks are devastating for amateurs, assuming they care about money. This is also why you see the same pros making deep runs in major deep stacked events on a consistent basis while they put up less than stellar results in short stacked events. The math is inexorable.
How Did the Amateurs Do in the Monster Stack Event?
If you look up all of the Monster Stack final table players on the Hendon Mob database, you will see that six of the nine players are what I would consider to be mediocre pros or complete pros in the $1,500 and smaller events. Two of the players, including the eventual winner, had almost no live results, but if you take a look at the events they were playing prior to this event, you will notice they were playing mostly high stakes European tournaments. This tells me they are almost certainly strong online players. If you are an online player who plays mostly on the internet and in Europe but you can find a way to come out to beautiful Las Vegas for the WSOP, you are probably excellent at poker. Only one of the players had relatively weak results and even then, he had some.
How did You Do in the Monster Stack Event?
I got lots of “hate tweets” when I lost, saying that if pros have such a large edge, why didn’t I win? There is a relatively large amount of variance in any poker tournament. How any individual pro fared in the event is entirely irrelevant. You must look at how we did as a whole. Considering that most likely eight out of the nine final table players were at least mediocre pros, we likely did better than average.
That being said, I doubled my 15,000 starting stack to 30,000 without going to a showdown within the first two hours. From there, I got all-in for a giant pot with A-K as an 85% favorite in a spot where I was fairly confident my opponent had A-K, A-Q, or A-J on an A-T-8 board. He had A-Q and got a Q on the river, putting me back to 15,000. I again ground up my stack with no showdown to get to 30,000, and then I lost with A-K versus A-J all-in before the flop to bust. Within a few short hours, I got my money in as an 85% favorite for a two starting stack pot, as a 73% favorite in a four starting stack pot, and I ground up two starting stacks.
I am entirely happy with my performance. The actual outcome (I lost) is irrelevant. Remember, if you are playing poker for a living, you only care about winning equity. Money will come in the long run.
Which Events Should Amateurs Play?
So, which WSOP events should amateurs play, if they are looking for good value for their tournament dollar? They should play events that have the highest variance because those lead to the most flips. This means the typical $1,000 and $1,500 events that have shallow stacks. The Millionaire Maker event is an excellent option for such amateurs looking to play a WSOP event because the stacks are short and the prize pool is huge. If you are looking to gamble hard with at least some equity, that is the event for you. Before buying in, realize you have around a .014% chance of winning, assuming you are a break-even player.
If they play a conservative strategy, they should play events that do not punish being tight with a deep stack. Since pot limit events do not have antes, those are the ideal events for amateurs. Despite this fact, pot limit events attract some of the smallest fields of the series. This is another example of blatant ignorance at work.
My books are a good place to start!
Notice that the WSOP Main Event, which is a giant $10,000 buy-in event, attracts loads of players, and proudly boasts the deepest structure of all events played around the world. This is the one event amateurs should not even consider playing. Instead, they show up in droves.
Of course, the amateurs could spend their time learning the game well before tackling fairly large buy-in events, whatever stack size they provide. That would certainly be a much wiser use of their time and money. Luckily for me, most people find studying to be boring. Poker is alive and well.
Once professionals stop being short-sighted and accept that whatever is good for the amateurs, whether they know it or not, is good for the game, they will fight hard to spread the truth. Sometimes you have to ruffle a few feathers and viciously attack ignorance along the way. I am willing to fight the fight.
Thank you for reading. If you have any comments at all, feel free to share them.