Tag: คาสิโน sa

การติดการพนันคืออะไรและมี 2 วิธีในการกู้คืน

ฉันชอบที่จะได้ยินความคิดของคุณเกี่ยวกับ bluff ที่ฉันทำที่ 5NL


GGNetwork – $ 0.05 NL (สูงสุด 6 คน) – Hold’em – ผู้เล่น 6 คน UTG (UTG): 100 BBMP (MP): 138 BBCO (CO): 75 BBBTN (BTN): 112.2 BBMB (CO): 143 BBHERO (BB): 101.4 ข้อความ BBMB 0.5 ข้อความ BB, BB 1 BBDealt Hero: 7c8cfold, ครั้ง, ครั้ง, ครั้ง, SB เพิ่มขึ้นถึง 3 BB, การโทรฮีโร่ฉันไม่รู้มากเกี่ยวกับ Villian ฉันเล่นกับเขาสองสามมือและดูเหมือนว่าเขาจะผิดด้าน แต่ดูเหมือนจะเป็น 5NL ที่มั่นคง แต่แม้จะเป็นตัวอย่างเล็ก ๆ น้อย ๆ ดังนั้นคุณสามารถเรียกมันว่าไม่รู้จักเลยทีเดียว และฉันผสมระหว่าง 3bet และโทรกับ 78s Flop (6 BB, 2 ผู้เล่น): 4d3h6sSB bet 1.2 BB, ฮีโร่เพิ่มเป็น 6.8 BB, SB เรียกกระดานแห้งสวย ฉันเดาว่าสิ่งนี้มีส่วนช่วยให้ระยะของเขาโดยรวมมากขึ้นเล็กน้อยเพราะเขามีส่วนเกินทั้งหมด แต่ฉันคิดว่าฉันมีข้อได้เปรียบเล็กน้อย แต่เราทั้งคู่มีอากาศมากและมีมือที่แข็งแกร่งเช่นกัน ฉันคิดว่าฉันควรจะเลี้ยงบอร์ดนี้ค่อนข้างก้าวร้าวโดยเฉพาะกับขนาดที่เล็กขนาดนี้ และฉันคิดว่ามือของฉันทำได้ดีเมื่อยกที่นี่เทิร์น (19.6 BB, ผู้เล่น 2 คน): เช็ค 6cSB, เดิมพัน Hero 20 BB, การโทร SB ฉันคิดว่านี่เป็นไพ่ที่ดีสำหรับฉัน ฉันมีมือที่แข็งแกร่งมากมายที่นี่และฉันคิดว่าฉันต้องการเดิมพันครั้งใหญ่กับพวกเขาหากฉันต้องการสร้างแม่น้ำติดขัด (มากกว่าที่ฉันคิดไว้เล็กน้อย) ฉันไม่รู้ว่าการเดิมพันเล็ก ๆ น้อย ๆ อาจสมเหตุสมผลหรือไม่ในตอนนี้ฉันอาจคิดผิดอย่างสิ้นเชิง แม่น้ำความคิดของคุณ (59.6 BB, ผู้เล่น 2 คน): เช็ค AKB, ฮีโร่เดิมพัน 71.6 BB และทุกอย่างอยู่ในนั้น, การเรียก MP ดังนั้นการ์ดใบนี้จะไม่เปลี่ยนแปลงฉันคิดว่ามีเพียงกระเป๋า Js เท่านั้นที่ปรับปรุง ฉันไม่ชอบบลัฟ 5NL และมักจะทำอะไรไม่ถูก แต่ฉันไม่เพียง แต่เต็มใจที่จะเอาชนะ 5NL เท่านั้นฉันยังสนใจที่จะลุกขึ้นมาเล่นโป๊กเกอร์ที่ดีในบางครั้งดังนั้นฉันจึงสงสัยว่าการเล่นตามทฤษฎีนั้นแย่แค่ไหน มีไม่กี่อย่างที่ทำให้ฉันไปได้ในตอนแรกเขาเป็นรถถังจากสายการโทรของเขาและนั่นทำให้ฉันคิดว่าเขาไม่แข็งแกร่ง แน่นอนว่ามือของฉันไม่มี SDV ฉันคิดว่ามันมีตัวบล็อกที่ดี เขาบล็อก 86, 76, 75 ที่เขาเรียกด้วย (หรือผู้เล่น 5NL เคยพับ 6 ที่อ่อนแอที่นี่และฉันคิดว่าคุณควรจะตามทฤษฎีแล้วมือของฉันก็แย่กว่าที่จะบลัฟด้วย?) เขาบล็อก 77 และ 88 ซึ่งไม่ได้ยอดเยี่ยม แต่ฉันยังคิดว่ามีมือมากกว่าสองสามมือที่สามารถเรียกเทิร์นและเพิ่มเดิมพันแม่น้ำนี้ได้เหมือนกับส่วนที่เหลือของ 77, 88 และ 55, 99, TT, 54 ไม่แน่ใจว่า QQ -AA แต่มือเหล่านี้อยู่ในจุดที่ยากลำบาก ฉันไม่แน่ใจว่าเขาเคยลงไปในแม่น้ำด้วยสิ่งที่อ่อนแอกว่าที่นี่หรือไม่ แน่นอนว่ามันมีความหมายหลายอย่างที่ไม่พับเช่นกัน แต่ใช่ฉันลังเลและ MP แสดง Qd6d และได้รับเงินกองกลางขอบคุณที่สละเวลาและชอบที่จะรับฟังความคิดเห็นของคุณเกี่ยวกับเรื่องนี้

แทงบอล คาสิโน
sa คาสิโน
คาสิโน ออนไลน์ มือถือ
คาสิโนtrue wallet ไม่มีขั้นต่ำ
คาสิโนbet

 Leave a comment    Posted in Poker Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Picture

Did the next Macau bubble just start two weeks ago?


The entire concept of a “bull market in stocks” makes little sense. Sound crazy? These days, certainly, because we’re always hearing about a perpetual bull market in stocks. Valuations increasingly disconnected from economic reality, asset bubbles in one class or another, armies of speculators moving like zombie hoards descending on the next fad and blowing it up to infinity and beyond, Buzz Lightyear-like.Why is the whole concept of a bull market generally, nonsense? Because if the value of everything is going up simultaneously, then nothing is going up. If everyone is a superhero, nobody is. If, in an imaginary economy, absolutely everything costs, say, $5, (labor, land, capital whatever) and then the next day everything costs $10, then what’s changed? The answer is absolutely nothing.The only thing that matters is relative valuations between asset classes. Let’s divide them into three of the most basic ones. Equities (stocks), bonds (debt), and commodities (consumer goods). If all three are going up in tandem, then there is no “bull market” in anything. If commodities are going up faster than stocks and bonds, you have inflation, or even hyperinflation. Ask anyone in Venezuela whether they care that their stock market is doing great, nominally. They don’t. They’re looking for their next glop of gruel or morsel of moldy bread to survive the day.But if stocks and bonds are rising and consumer goods are static to falling, you have a bull market in financial assets. This is where we are now. And boy are we really hard and deep into it now. Below is the ratio of the S&P 500 to the CRB Commodities Index.And I’ve got news for everyone. This bull market in stocks relative to consumer goods in dollar terms is already over. It ended almost a year ago. On April 20, 2020 to be exact. Red circle blowoff top above. That was when oil crashed to negative $35 a barrel and we all lived in an alternative financial freakhouse universe. But I have more news than that. This entire “bull market” in stocks has been one gigantic illusion from the very beginning. Stocks aren’t going up. They haven’t gone up for 21 years. Money is going down. Here is the graph of stocks relative to the prime monetary commodity, gold, over the same timeframe above.We can see here that from 1990 to 2000, we had a real bull market in stocks. Equities rocketed in gold terms and in terms of consumer goods generally. Everyone felt richer. Portfolios up, expenses down. But since that time, money has been dying at an accelerated pace and the standard of living has fallen.The bull market in stocks over the last 21 years has been an illusion, a tiny echo of the bull that ended at the turn of the century. We have spent the last 21 years trying to reinflate it, but gold has exposed the lie. We are now at the point where the illusion is about to collapse completely. In my view, we have only a few months left until it all hits the fan. Until then, the bubbles will keep coming in staccato frenetic fashion, moving from one asset class to another faster and faster, until we all get so dizzy we can’t follow it anymore. Last week I speculated that maybe the next target for the zombie hoard will be in penny gaming stocks. I was close. It’s in Macau stocks. It may already have started two weeks ago. The frenzy has started over news about China opening up again. I mean, just look at this crazy chart of the Macau proxy ETF:That last surge higher is just since February 1. We could be at the beginning of a crazy but brief ride higher in Macau stocks right now. New all time highs again, and Macau isn’t even fully open yet. The latest full month statistics for December show a 78.6% drop in visitors year over year. And yet we’re at new all time highs in these stocks already. It’s just completely crazy. I can understand the Macau opening up again trade, but to argue that this factor is being priced in at these levels, at new all time highs? As if none of this full year shutdown hurt any of the casinos fundamentally at all? That’s just totally bonkers crazy. It’s a reflection of the value of the currency these stocks are priced in, not the stocks themselves.What’s happening is that the zombie hoard of bubble chasers is reading the headlines regarding China starting to open up again, and they’re slamming buy orders and call options like they’ve been doing with tech stocks and Gamestop and BTC and all the other fads. We just got news out of Bloomberg that China’s Imax had a face-ripping rally due to exploding ticket sales. China is, indeed opening up, and the zombie hoard of speculators is now going to spray their money hoses at anything Chinese. Macau might be at the center of it.How high can this Macau bubble go, if that’s what we just saw start two weeks ago? The truth is, it doesn’t matter. If you get into it, you’ll get hooked and keep levering yourself up, counting your paper gains, unable to separate from them until you get caught in a vortex. At some point, my view this year, it’s all going to come crashing down when all the damage from 2020 is finally revealed all over the world. You can’t paper it over forever. The damage to Macau casinos doesn’t just go away. It festers in the form of more and more debt, and a damaged consumer base that can no longer patronize casinos in the way it once could. Festering wounds need the paper bandage removed and they need to be operated on. That is painful. And it’s coming.When we think of the word “bubble”, what are we really talking about? A bubble is something that looks, from the outside, to be really big and stable. The shape of it, a sphere, is the most stable shape in the universe. It’s why planets, stars, moons, and possibly even the spacetime continuum itself, spontaneously shape themselves into spheres. The force of gravity equalizes at every point on the sphere, forming equilibrium. Nature always seeks equilibrium. And so bubbles take on the illusion of stability, but unlike a real sphere, there’s nothing inside them. When they pop, they are gone almost instantly. This one is about to pop. Macau appears to be the next victim sucked up by the bubble. Macau will survive and rebuild. The question is, in what form? I wouldn’t take a bet the depended on me getting the answer to that question right.

777ww คาสิโน
wm คาสิโน
คาสิโน ปอยเปต
คาสิโน ออนไลน์ ได้เงินจริง
สมัคร คาสิโน

 Leave a comment    Posted in Business, China, Macau, Macau Bubble, stocks Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Picture

Silver Trails’ Slot Review


A title like Silver Trails offers a Wild West theme. Notwithstanding this well known theme, this present Novomatic’s slot has 5 reels, 3 rows and 243 different ways to win. In spite of these features, the game has various and interesting things on offer.The Wilds and Scatters are essential for the combination and they carry multipliers with them just as a Jackpot Feature which allows you to win one of 4 different bonanzas. A bet feature is likewise available.Betting and Prizes Much the same as in most slot games, you’ll need to match identical images to get prizes. You can get 3 images in a combo and win a prize. Be that as it may, you can likewise get 4 or 5 of them and improve prize. As said earlier, this game allows you to win one out of 4 bonanzas. They are the Mini, Minor, Major, and Grand bonanzas. Silver Trails has a lot to offer.Silver Trails’ Slot Features Since the royal card images are very famous you’ll see them in this title too. They are joined by the 10 image just as images that fit the theme. These are the revolver and bullet, the cowboy and others.Normally, there are some exceptional images in the combination. The Wild is the first and it seems stacked on reels 2 and 4. Other than this one, you additionally have the Silver Star image which is the Scatter one. At the point when it lands on reels 1, 3, or 5 you’ll get a multiplier that equals the sum on the stars that landed.Also, the Scatter is liable for another feature too. However, for that, you’ll need at least 6 Scatters to trigger this feature. When this occurs, the images that set off the feature remain and place, and you get 3 Bonus spins. The counter moves to 3 when you land another Scatter.On the off chance that you are able to cover the whole reels with the Silver Star image, you’ll get the Grand Jackpot. Then again, you can get any of the other 3. Strong multipliers are additionally important for this feature and they can get as high as 20x your stake.The last feature that allows you to increase your rewards is the Gamble feature. In any case, it’s a dangerous feature as you can lose them on the off chance that you don’t play it right.Theme and Design With Silver Trails slot fans are given another title that is motivated by the Wild West. The images and the background of the game look stunning and the game mechanics are impeccable. At long last, the game’s engineers didn’t mix out the opportunity to make this a mobile-friendly game too.ConclusionSilver Trails takes you to the Wild West and allows you to earn huge prizes. Because of the Jackpot feature you can leave with 1 out of 4 magnificent bonanzas. On the other hand, you can try our the bet feature and appreciate the multipliers that come with the Silver Stars. Wilds are in the combination too.

หวยออนไลน์
เล่นหวยออนไลน์
ไพ่ออนไลน์
เว็บ คาสิโน
คาสิโน777

 Leave a comment    Posted in bet, casino, casino game, casino slot, gambling, online casino, online casino game Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
สิ่งที่ทำให้เกิดการพนันซ้ำและวิธีป้องกัน

สื่อสังคมออนไลน์ที่ไม่ใช่ชุมชนสำหรับสโมสรฟุตบอลในสหราชอาณาจักรเมื่อ BGC เข้าร่วม


เป็นการยากที่จะจินตนาการถึงอุตสาหกรรมการพนันวานิลลาที่ใหญ่กว่าที่บางคนต้องการสร้างในสหราชอาณาจักรเมื่อประเทศเกิดจาก Brexit และสามารถยืนได้ด้วยสองเท้าของตัวเองดูเหมือนว่าใครจะไม่สนใจที่จะตัดแหล่งรายได้ สิ่งสำคัญที่สุดคือบางคนพยายามอย่างหนักเพื่อให้มีอำนาจในการส่งเสริมอุตสาหกรรมการพนันด้วยข้อ จำกัด กฎหมายข้อ จำกัด และข้อ จำกัด ต่างๆมาโดยตลอด เจ้าหน้าที่บางคนต้องตื่นขึ้นมาในตอนกลางคืนเพื่อพยายามคิดว่าจะไปเล่นการพนันได้อย่างไร ในการเคลื่อนไหวใหม่เหล่านี้สภาการเดิมพันและการเล่นเกม (BGC) ได้ใช้กฎใหม่สำหรับสโมสรฟุตบอลที่ป้องกันไม่ให้พวกเขาใช้โซเชียลมีเดียเพื่อพูดคุยเกี่ยวกับการพนันกีฬา แนะนำวิธีการจัดการใหม่ ๆ ในเรื่องนี้สโมสรไม่ควรใช้บัญชีโซเชียลมีเดียเพื่อส่งเสริมการบริจาคการพนันและผู้จัดการการพนันกีฬา รหัสใหม่จะมีผลตั้งแต่วันที่ 1 มีนาคมและจะป้องกันการใช้คำกระตุ้นการตัดสินใจหรือเชื่อมโยงเว็บไซต์การพนันกับทวีตคาร์บอนจากคลับและจะป้องกันไม่ให้สโมสรเข้าถึงการแสดงประเภทโบนัสที่เหมาะสมและเกมหรือการพนันในทวีตสด ข้อแตกต่างเพียงอย่างเดียวคือหากสโมสรอ้างว่าสั่งให้ไม่มีใครอายุต่ำกว่า 18 ปีเห็นสิ่งนี้จะเป็นไปไม่ได้หากโซเชียลมีเดียเช่น Facebook และ Twitter ได้รับอนุญาตให้เข้าสังคม ความกังวลว่าผู้ใช้โซเชียลมีเดียและปัญหาการพนันบางรายอาจ“ อารมณ์เสีย” หากเห็นข้อมูลการพนันขณะเรียกดูฟีดโซเชียลมีเดีย หากเป็นเช่นนั้นโฆษณาประเภทใดก็ตามที่มีอาหารขยะอาจถูกแบนเนื่องจากมีแนวโน้มว่าผู้ที่มีปัญหาร้ายแรงจะได้รับผลกระทบ มิฉะนั้นอาจไม่อนุญาตให้โปรโมตวันวาเลนไทน์เนื่องจากอาจเป็นปัญหาสำหรับผู้ที่เลิกรากัน ระบบการกำกับดูแลใหม่หลังจากการริเริ่มที่นำเสนอเมื่อปีที่แล้วได้รับการออกแบบมาเพื่อลดการพนัน ผู้ให้บริการเกม “ฟรี” เริ่มโปรโมตโฆษณาทางทีวีและวิทยุ COVID-19 และตาม BGC ได้เปลี่ยนนโยบายการโฆษณาเพื่อเพิ่มยอดขายในผู้ที่อายุต่ำกว่า 18 ปี การดำเนินการใหม่นี้เป็นส่วนเสริมและอาจไม่ใช่ครั้งสุดท้ายและบริจิดซิมมอนด์ประธานบีจีซีกล่าวว่า “สโมสรฟุตบอลเป็นส่วนสำคัญของเวทีกีฬาของประเทศนี้ตามด้วยผู้คนหลายล้านคนที่มีอายุมากกว่าโซเชียลมีเดีย สมาชิกไม่มีสิทธิ์เล่นการพนันที่มีอายุต่ำกว่า 18 ปีเนื่องจากเป็นธุรกิจที่เราเข้าใจว่าเด็ก ๆ มีความเสี่ยงในการเล่นการพนันบนอินเทอร์เน็ตโซเชียลมีเดียแนวทางใหม่ของเราเข้าใจมาตรฐานที่ควรใช้กับสโมสรฟุตบอลเมื่อพวกเขาโพสต์ การโปรโมตการพนันบนโซเชียลมีเดียและฉันหวังว่าพวกเขาจะถูกนำไปใช้โดยเร็วที่สุด ”

777ww คาสิโน
wm คาสิโน
คาสิโน ปอยเปต
คาสิโน ออนไลน์ ได้เงินจริง
สมัคร คาสิโน

 Leave a comment    Posted in BGC, Business, Soccer, social media, sports gambling Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
รีวิวการเดิมพันแอ ธ เลติก Bibao VS Getafe

แอป Wsop


สวัสดีทุกคนฉันยังใหม่กับโป๊กเกอร์ดังนั้นฉันจึงยังคงเรียนรู้มากมายทุกวัน แอป wsop ทำให้การออกกำลังกายของฉันง่ายขึ้นฉันจึงสนุก สองสามวันแรกที่ฉันมีแอปพลิเคชันทุกคืนฉันน้ำตาไหลฉันได้รับพลังของมือหลังจากความเข้มแข็ง ตรงเพื่อล้างและแม้แต่ครั้งเดียวเพื่อล้างตรง ฉันยังไม่ได้รับ B หรือดีกว่า ฉันพบว่าหลังจากนั้นไม่กี่วันมันก็ยากขึ้นมากสำหรับฉัน: ฉันมีความหลังตรงที่ฟลอปและฟลัชในแม่น้ำเอาชนะฉัน ฉันตระหนักดีว่าด้วยเวลาและประสบการณ์ฉันสามารถอ่านและทำนายแฟลชนี้ได้ดีขึ้น แต่เมื่อสองวันที่ผ่านมาฉันเริ่มมีความสุขกับแอปพลิเคชันน้อยลงเรื่อย ๆ มันสนุกมากเมื่อทุกคนในโต๊ะมีเงินเท่ากันตอนนี้แม้ว่าฉันจะเล่นโต๊ะที่ต่ำกว่าพวกเขาก็เป็นแค่ผู้เล่นที่ร่ำรวยสกปรกที่ประเมินทุกอย่างตั้งแต่เครื่องปัดไปจนถึงแม่น้ำ แน่นอนว่าโป๊กเกอร์เป็นเรื่องเกี่ยวกับการกลั่นแกล้งคู่ต่อสู้ของคุณเป็นครั้งคราว แต่มันจะไร้สาระเมื่อผู้คนต้องพับพรีฟล็อปแม้ว่าจะมีความยากลำบากสูงก็ตามเพราะกลัวว่าฉันจะไม่จับคู่เพียงเพื่อที่จะรู้ว่าฉันจะมีสัตว์ประหลาดถ้าฉัน จะรอ. บางทีฉันอาจต้องฝึกฝนเพิ่มเติมหรือดูวิดีโอเพิ่มเติมเพื่อรับข้อมูลพื้นฐาน (ขอคำแนะนำเพิ่มเติม) แต่สองวันที่ผ่านมาเป็นเหตุการณ์ที่ยากที่สุดที่ฉันเคยมีมาและนั่นทำให้ฉันไม่สามารถใช้แอพนี้ต่อไปได้ แน่นอนว่าเกมนี้เกี่ยวกับทักษะและโชค แต่มันเริ่มทำให้ฉันโกรธเมื่อสองวันที่ผ่านมาฉันพ่ายแพ้ด้วยพลังอำนาจทั้งหมด ฉันมีจักรยาน? มีคนวาดตรงหรือฟลัชระดับไฮเอนด์ มี 3 ตัวที่เหมือนกันหรือไม่? มีคนสี่คน แม้ว่าฉันจะมีบ้านเต็มฉันก็ชนะ บางทีฉันอาจต้องดูวิดีโอเกี่ยวกับวิธีถอดรหัสบอร์ดให้ดีขึ้นเพื่อดูว่าฉันมีถั่ว แต่ฉันไม่พบวิดีโอที่มีประโยชน์ ฉันรู้ว่าดูเหมือนฉันกำลังบ่น แต่นั่นไม่ได้หมายความว่าฉันถูกคนหลายคนทุบตีเสมอไป แต่เป็นผู้เล่นรวยสกปรกที่โชคดีในแม่น้ำหรือพลิกไพ่ และบุคคลนั้นจะคอยจับมือกลั่นแกล้งคนทั้งโต๊ะ แน่นอนว่านี่เป็นแอปพลิเคชันออนไลน์ที่อาจไม่ใช่การสุ่มที่สมบูรณ์แบบ แต่แอปพลิเคชันนี้ไร้สาระในจุดใด ตามความเป็นจริงแล้วผู้เล่นคนเดียวกันมีไพ่สูงที่ดีกว่าหรือสเตรทฟลัชที่ดีกว่าหรือดีกว่า 6/10 ในมือหรือดีกว่า? นรกแม้ว่าฉันจะเล่นได้ดีที่สุด แต่ฉันก็คิดว่ามันน่าสงสัย แต่ฉันได้รับมือหลังจากเซ็ตที่ยอดเยี่ยม แต่ตอนนี้แทบจะเหมือนกับว่าฉันไม่เคยชนะเลยเว้นแต่จะมีใครสักคนที่บลัฟฟ์และฉันไม่ได้เห็นมันหรือฉันใช้กลยุทธ์เพื่อสร้าง คนอื่นคิดว่าฉันมีไพ่ที่ดีที่สุด ที่กล่าวว่าฉันโทรไปไม่ถูกต้องดังนั้นการสูญเสียทั้งหมดของฉันจึงไม่สามารถสะท้อนให้เห็นได้ แต่บางคนรู้สึกว่าแทบจะเป็นหัวเรือใหญ่ราวกับว่าเกมให้ความช่วยเหลือผู้เล่นบางคนที่โต๊ะ ฉันมักจะเล่นอย่างชาญฉลาดและโทรออกเพียงเล็กน้อยและพับให้เดิมพันสูงเท่านั้นเว้นแต่ฉันจะมีเซ็ตที่มั่นคงหรือแม้กระทั่งฟลัชที่เป็นไปได้หรือตรงที่เหมาะกับฉัน นรกฉันสังเกตเห็นว่าฉันเล่นได้ดีขึ้นในทัวร์นาเมนต์ที่ผู้คนเล่นได้สมจริงกว่าเล็กน้อย และฉันระมัดระวังมากขึ้นเกี่ยวกับชุดที่ฉันเดิมพัน แต่เมื่อพูดถึงนอกทัวร์นาเมนต์ดูเหมือนว่าเกมนี้จะเป็นแค่การหมุนรอบตัวเองเหมือนเขาจงใจที่จะทำให้ฉันโกรธ ผู้ใช้แอปรายอื่นอาจมีประสบการณ์การเล่นที่ยุติธรรมกว่านี้ แต่ฉันถูกรังแกในช่วงสองวันที่ผ่านมาและฉันก็ยิ่งโกรธมากขึ้นเมื่อคนรวยพูดปดและฉันจะมี C หรือ C แต่ฉันตัดสินใจที่จะไม่ใช้ไพ่แบบสุ่มทั้งหมดที่ไม่มีการฟลัชหรือตรงเช่นไพ่พิเศษ 2 และ 9 ใบหรือพ็อกเก็ตสามใบ อย่าลังเลที่จะทอดฉันถ้าฉันดูโง่ แต่จากมุมมองของฉันแอพนี้ก็ตลกในบางครั้ง

แทงบอล คาสิโน
sa คาสิโน
คาสิโน ออนไลน์ มือถือ
คาสิโนtrue wallet ไม่มีขั้นต่ำ
คาสิโนbet

 Leave a comment    Posted in Poker Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
รีวิวการเดิมพันแอ ธ เลติก Bibao VS Getafe

40 Supreme Fruits Slot Review


ด้วยชื่ออย่าง 40 Supreme Fruits คุณจะรู้ได้อย่างแน่นอนว่าจะมีธีมแบบไหน สล็อตนี้มีความไม่สามารถคาดเดาได้ปานกลาง 5 วงล้อและรูปภาพ 4 คอลัมน์ ซึ่งรวมถึง 40 วิธีต่างๆในการประสบความสำเร็จและคุณสมบัติที่น่าทึ่ง โดยรวมแล้วคุณจะเห็นไวลด์และสแคตเทอร์ทุกที่บนวงล้อและคุณจะเห็นเพชรแจ็คพอตและคุณสมบัติสองหรือไม่มีเลย การเดิมพันและของขวัญเนื่องจากนี่เป็นตัวแทนของสล็อตคลาสสิกคุณจึงตระหนักดีว่าคุณต้องได้รับภาพที่คล้ายกันจำนวนมากเพื่อครองเกมนี้ คุณจะต้องมีของขวัญที่จำเป็นอย่างน้อย 3 ชิ้นจากทั้งหมด ไม่ว่าจะด้วยวิธีใดรางวัลของคุณจะใหญ่ขึ้นเมื่อคุณได้รับ 4 หรือ 5 ด้วยภาพที่ผิดปกติในชุดค่าผสมคุณสามารถทำให้เกมโดดเด่นได้เมื่อเปิดใช้งานคุณสมบัติ 40 Supreme Fruits Slot คุณสมบัติธีมยอดนิยมมีภาพที่คุ้นเคย ในทำนองเดียวกันส้มองุ่นลูกพลัมมะนาวเชอร์รี่และผลไม้อื่น ๆ สามารถพบได้ในวงล้อ อย่างไรก็ตามคุณไม่ได้อยู่คนเดียว Wilds, scatterers และ reels ปรากฏขึ้น โดยทั่วไปแล้ว Wilds จะช่วยให้คุณเดินทางในขณะที่คุณผสมผสานและจับคู่ภาพยนตร์ทั่วไป ในทำนองเดียวกัน Scatter สามารถช่วยคุณสร้างส่วนผสมที่ประสบความสำเร็จเมื่อคุณได้ภาพอย่างน้อย 3 ภาพในการผสม ในเวลานั้นมีคุณสมบัติเพชรแจ็คพอตที่สามารถให้หนึ่งในแจ็คพอตได้ สุดท้ายมีเกมสองหรือไม่มีเลยที่สามารถช่วยเพิ่มรางวัลของคุณหรือช่วยให้คุณแพ้ ธีมและการออกแบบธีมที่เป็นที่รู้จักนำเสนอการออกแบบที่ยอดเยี่ยม ‌ 40 Supreme Fruits ‌ พร้อมคุณสมบัติที่ยอดเยี่ยมบางอย่าง

คาสิโน888
คาสิโน88
เกม คาสิโน
เกมส์ คาสิโน
ts911 คาสิโน ออนไลน์

 Leave a comment    Posted in bet, casino, casino game, casino slot, gambling, online casino, online casino game Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
การเสพติดความบันเทิงและการพนัน

รีวิวสล็อต Tyrant King Megaways


Tyrant King Megaways เล่น 6 วงล้อรับ 117,649 Megaways ในระหว่างการหมุนปกติ แต่ในทำนองเดียวกันจะได้รับมากถึง 200,704 วิธีที่แตกต่างกันเมื่อมีโอกาสได้รับฟรีสปิน นอกจากฟรีสปินแล้วยังมีรีลแบบเรียงซ้อนตัวคูณการขยายตัวไวด์และรีสปิน เงินปันผลสามารถยอมรับได้มากโดยมีการเดิมพัน 10,000x และ 96% RTP การเดิมพันและเงินรางวัล $ 0.20 เป็นเดิมพันต่ำสุดสำหรับผู้เล่นส่วนใหญ่และเป็นจำนวนเงินต่ำสุดที่ Tyrant King Megaways อนุญาต ในทางกลับกันการเดิมพันสูงสุดที่ใช้คือสูงถึง $ 20 และการชนะครั้งใหญ่คือโอกาสในสล็อตที่ต้องพึ่งพา Megaways อย่างสม่ำเสมอซึ่งเป็นแรงจูงใจสำคัญที่ทำให้เกมเหล่านี้ได้รับความนิยม อย่างไรก็ตามไม่ใช่เรื่องง่ายเพราะเป็นเรื่องที่คาดเดาไม่ได้อย่างมาก ทุกสิ่งที่พิจารณา Bonanza RTP ที่มีสัดส่วนการเดิมพันสูงถึง 10,000 ครั้งถูกกำหนดไว้ที่ 96% คุณสมบัติสล็อต Tyrant King Megaways ที่เกี่ยวข้องกับระบบ Megaways ขึ้นอยู่กับจำนวนวงล้อคงที่ (6 ในกรณีนี้) แต่สำหรับภาพจำนวนเท่าใดก็ได้ (2-7 ระหว่างการหมุนปกติ) วิธีนี้ช่วยให้คุณได้รับรางวัลมากถึง 117,649 วิธีในระหว่างการหมุนปกติ เมื่อเกิดการรวมกันรีลแบบเรียงซ้อนจะถูกทริกเกอร์เพื่อลบรูปภาพที่ชนะและเพิ่มรูปภาพอื่น สิ่งนี้สามารถจุดประกายชัยชนะและน้ำตกได้มากขึ้น ฟังก์ชันสปินและ Respins จะทำงาน มันให้รางวัลสไตล์ Hold and Win แก่คุณด้วยการตอบสนอง 3 ครั้งในระหว่างนี้คุณจะต้องได้รับไวลด์พิเศษสำหรับวงล้อของคุณ สามารถแสดงเฉพาะตำแหน่งที่ไม่เหมาะสมและว่างเปล่าในโหมดนี้ คุณรวบรวมการตั้งค่าเสริมและการตั้งค่าใหม่ที่อาจปรากฏขึ้น หากวงล้อถูกปิดทับมันจะกลายเป็นไวด์ตัวคูณ การตอบสนองจะถูกรีเซ็ตเมื่อคุณได้รับไวลด์ใหม่และเมื่อสิ้นสุดคุณสมบัตินี้คุณจะได้รับไวลด์ทั้งหมดที่ใช้เป็นส่วนประกอบของส่วนผสมใหม่ในเกมหลัก คอมโบทั้งหมดสูงสุด 6 ไวลด์จะจ่ายที่ 50 เท่าของเงินเดิมพันและจะได้รับสูงสุด 15 รอบเมื่อแสดงไข่ไดโนเสาร์ที่กระจัดกระจายมากถึง 6 ใบ มีการเพิ่มรูปภาพหนึ่งบรรทัดเพื่อเพิ่มพื้นที่ในเกมดังนั้นตอนนี้คุณสามารถชนะ 200,704 วิธีต่างๆ คุณสมบัติอื่นรวมถึงตัวคูณการขยายซึ่งจะเพิ่มขึ้น 1 สำหรับแต่ละน้ำตกใหม่ ธีมและการออกแบบเราย้อนกลับไปในสมัยที่ไดโนเสาร์เดินทางและควบคุมโลกใบนี้ ทีเร็กซ์จะเป็นดาราในป่าและไข่ไดโนเสาร์จะเป็นตัวแทนของการวางไข่ ภาพมาตรฐาน ได้แก่ Adventurer, Cavewoman, Three Kinds of Dinosaurs และภาพวาด 10 ถึง A Royals เมื่อถึงจุดนั้น Jurassic Park ก็อยู่ในใจเนื่องจากเป็นการผสมผสานระหว่างยุคก่อนประวัติศาสตร์และยุคปัจจุบันและไม่สามารถหาได้จากที่อื่น บทสรุป Tyrant King Megaway นั้นน่าสนใจด้วยคุณสมบัติใหม่ที่เราสามารถทดลองใช้ได้แล้ว ฉันรู้และสนุกกับมัน การชนะสูงสุดของเงินเดิมพัน 10,000x ไม่ใช่เรื่องพิเศษในสล็อต Megaways แต่มันก็ดูดีมากที่ทุกอย่างเท่าเทียมกัน

หวยออนไลน์
เล่นหวยออนไลน์
ไพ่ออนไลน์
เว็บ คาสิโน
คาสิโน777

 Leave a comment    Posted in bet, casino, casino game, casino slot, gambling, online casino, online casino game Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
สิ่งที่ทำให้เกิดการพนันซ้ำและวิธีป้องกัน

Coaching Steven Begleiter for the 2009 WSOP Final Table

Steve at the WSOP Final Table. Image © PokerNews
This is a “Retro Blog” from 11/8/2010 discussing the time I spent coaching 2009 WSOP Main Event final table member, Steven Begleiter.
Back when I initially made this post, I was a terrible writer. I decided to clean up the grammar and fix the typos. Believe it or not, but I used to be (and still am to some extent) a sloppy writer.
I have endless problems proofreading my own writing. I constantly struggle to not overlook countless minor, but obvious, mistakes in all forms of writing including books, blogs, twitter posts, emails, and text messages. Perhaps my brain is broken. Please know I try my best!
Getting the Job
Ylon Schwartz and I have never revealed that we spent three months coaching Steven Begleiter through his preparation for the final table of the 2009 WSOP Main Event.
I was initially introduced to Steve through a 2+2 forum member, Ben Lambert, who knew me from back in my sit n’ go days, where I had a considerable amount of success. Of course, my live success also got me on the radar. Given all final tables are essentially sit n’ go tournaments with funny payouts and stack sizes, he thought I would be an excellent candidate to transform Steve into a player with a better than average shot at taking home the bracelet.
It is worth noting that Steve won his way into the 2009 Main Event through a fairly high stakes local league. Ben also participates in this league, which is how he knows Steve.
Ylon Schwartz. Image © PokerNews
I should mention now that Steve is an extremely intelligent guy. I now look up to him as a mentor. He possesses an important life ability that many lack. He is aware that there are many things he doesn’t know and he isn’t afraid to seek help when he thinks he can improve.
Steve knew he wanted to hire a coach so he interviewed lots poker professionals to find the best fit. He narrowed his search down to me and Ylon Schwartz, a chess master who final tabled the WSOP Main Event in 2008. I had no experience with Ylon but shortly after meeting him, it became clear he had a solid grasp of poker.
I was fairly sure Steve was going to pick Ylon, mainly because both he and Ylon live in New York. At the time, I lived across the country in Vegas. I did some negotiating and succeeded in getting the job split between the two of us, which worked out quite well.
I ended up flying to New York three times, once for our initial interview and two other times to spend long weekends coaching Steve. During these weekends, we discussed and played poker constantly. Steve is a super busy guy with a hectic job and a full family life. Despite that, he always spent our time together working hard and quickly absorbed everything I taught him.
Most people, especially when it comes to poker, are stuck in their ways. They refuse to believe they might actually be bad at poker. Steve was the opposite, realizing that Ylon and I were on a different level than he was. He learned a lot from us because he had an open mind and wanted to learn.
Our First Trip
After our initial interview, we decided it would be a good idea for Steve to fly to Vegas and drive with me to Los Angeles to play the WPT event at the Bicycle Casino. We discussed poker during the entire car ride. I think we both learned a ton. I ended up cashing in the event but Steve ended up taking 9th place, which was really impressive considering the field was tough and we had just started working on his game.
Steve with fellow WSOP final tablist Kevin Schaffel at the Legends of Poker WPT event. Image © PokerListings
He claimed the advice I gave him allowed him to avoid going broke twice in the tournament whereas before our lessons, he would have busted early on the first day. That is a good thing! A lot of what I taught him was to control the size of the pot with his good, but not amazing hands, such as top pair with a marginal kicker. You will find it is quite difficult for your bets to get called on three streets by hands worse than top pair with a bad kicker. This means you need to check them at some point. You will find that checking often induces your opponent to either over value his worse made hand or try to bluff you off your “obvious” weak holding. By checking, you extract additional value you would normally miss by betting.
I learned from Steve that most amateur players simply do not pay attention to stack sizes. The concept that each stack size requires a vastly different strategy isn’t something they are aware of. Poker requires a very different strategy when you have 20 big blinds than when you have 100 big blinds. We worked hard on these two concepts and I think he became a much better poker player almost overnight. Steve was sad to take 9th place, but at the same time, he realized it was a great accomplishment.
Working Hard at Home
Back in New York, we ran numerous simulations where we would set up stacks according to the final table stack sizes and try to match up each stack with a player whose playing styles were similar to those of the actual final table players. Steve did reasonably well in most of these sessions, so that was encouraging.
After our first full NYC weekend, Steve decided to play the WSOP Europe. He was one of the chip leaders early in the first day but ran into a few unavoidable situations and was eliminated. While going broke is rarely a good thing, the fact that he is clearly capable of gathering chips means he always has a chance to win. You would much rather have large swings than break even in a poker tournament because in order to win, you have to get all of the chips. Hanging out, waiting for premium hands, is usually not a good idea, especially if your opponents play well.
Before meeting Steve, I assumed I would have to work hard on getting him in good physical shape, as most poker players are not in shape at all. Luckily, Steve was already in excellent shape. There is nothing worse than being technically sound at poker but crashing late in a session due to poor fitness. Once he made the final table, he was frequently in the gym and worked out much harder than I expected. I was, and still am, incredibly proud of his preparation, both on and off the felt.
I also made a point to ensure he was on the proper sleep schedule. If you get tired at midnight but you happen to be required to play until 4am, the wheels could easily fall off. I believe getting Steve on the proper sleep schedule also helped set him up for success.
That’s enough talk about the preparation. On to the final table!
Tackling the WSOP Main Event Final Table
Steve had one of the worst seats at the table, having Eric Buchman, the only other “known” world class player with a ton of chips, on his left. Also to Steve’s left was Joe Cada, who we assumed would play his short stack well, given that he had a ton of online experience. We assumed Antonie Saout, Jeff Schulman, Kevin Schaffel, and Darvin Moon would play fairly tight. We thought James Akenhead, Phil Ivey, and Joe Cada would look to mix it up a bit and try to double their short stacks. We assumed Buchman would try to go after Steve, due to his position, with numerous light calls and reraises.
You may be surprised that we did not assess Ivey as much of a threat, at least as the chips currently sat. Steve had position on Ivey, which automatically gave Steve a huge edge. Also, Ivey didn’t have many chips, meaning he would have to double up a few times before he got in contention. It is fairly difficult, even for Phil Ivey, to double up a few times. In all of the simulations we ran, I (playing in Phil Ivey’s seat) never really got too far off the ground. Starting with a small stack is a huge disadvantage.
It turned out we were generally correct in all of our assumptions except that Saout wasn’t too tight and Ivey was super tight. Early in the day, it looked like Schaffel was going to double through Buchman, which would have made the table much better for Steve because chips flow to the left and Steve had position on Schaffel, but his A-A couldn’t beat K-K.
This was the first crushing blow to our day that few people seemed to notice. It is really bad when a loose, aggressive player on your left gets lots of chips because he will use them to constantly apply pressure on you. That would have been fine if Steve could have made a strong trapping hand, but, if you have ever played poker, you will find you cannot rely on making strong hands.
A Few Minor Missteps
As for Steve’s play at the final table, I was completely satisfied with all of his decisions except two that came up near the end of the day.
In the first one, he raised with 8c-7c and Saout, who was certainly playing the best out of anyone else at the table, reraised from the big blind. Saout had been going after Steve a little, although not too much. I don’t recall the exact stack sizes but I think Steve had 44,000,000 and Saout had 23,000,000. The blinds were 250,000/500,000. Steve raised to 1,500,000 and Saout reraised to 4,500,000. Steve elected to call, which is fairly loose and likely bad given Saout’s relatively short effective stack size.  Saout checked on the 9h-8h-3c flop and Steve bet 5,250,000. I really dislike this bet because if Saout decided to go all-in, Steve would be getting decent odds to call with a fairly marginal hand. In general, you do not want to bet an amount that makes your decision difficult. You want to set yourself up to have easy decisions. A smaller bet or a check from Steve would have been much better. Anyway, Saout did push all-in and Steve made what was likely a “correct” call. Saout turned over a flush draw and won when a heart came on the turn.
It worked out pretty well for Joe Cada. Image © PokerNews
If you watched the coverage of this event prior to the final table, you likely know that Steve loves calling reraises with suited connectors. We worked hard to cut that out of his game, especially against good players who will not blindly stack off to you or when you are not getting large implied odds, but he still decided to take a flop in this situation. Despite that “error”, he got his money in with about 50% equity, so I suppose it wasn’t too bad. It is rarely a bad thing to be in a flipping spot where if you lose, you will still have a decent stack and if you win, you will have a gigantic chip lead. Losing this hand was the second major thing that went wrong for Steve.
The next hand Steve lost may appear to be fairly minor, but it had huge consequences, as it helped determine the champion. Joe Cada raised to 2.5 big blinds out of his 20 big blind stack from first position and Steve called from the small blind with As-3s. The flop came Ah-Jc-2s. Steve elected to be bet into Joe, a move which I despise. Cada decided to call the lead. They checked down the turn and the river, giving Steve a tiny pot. I would have much preferred to see him check-call with the intention of inducing Cada to bluff off his stack. Instead of having a realistic chance of inducing Cada to bluff by showing weakness, Steve won almost nothing.
The final bad thing that happened to Steve was actually a standard bad beat. Steve raised to 2.5 big blinds out of his 35 big blind stack from middle position with Q-Q and Darvin Moon pushed all-in from one of the blinds with A-Q. Steve, of course, called instantly. The flop came X-X-X-X-A and Steve was out. He busted in 6th place, collecting $1,587,160.
Life Goes On
Steve giving an exit interview. Image © PokerNews
Steve took his loss exceptionally well and gave a few excellent exit interviews. I do not know if I would have maintained my composure after running fairly bad during the entire final table. He is a strong man.
Steve was an absolute joy to work with. I don’t think anyone else at the final table would have been a better student. Even though he made a few mistakes, none of which turned out to be too costly in terms of equity, I firmly believe he made significantly fewer mistakes than he would have without coaching. If Steve had a desire to make it on the professional poker circuit, I am confident he could. That being said, he has an awesome job and life, which he has no desire to leave, so he will remain a world class weekend warrior.
When I first got the job to coach Steve, I was happy simply to get the job but I am now honored to have a friend for life. Hopefully someone decides to take the plunge with me again next year. I loved the experience. Better yet, I will try to make the final table myself.
If you enjoyed this post, please share it with your friends. Thank you for reading.

.

คาสิโน ออนไลน์888
ทางเข้า คาสิโน
คาสิโน 1688
คาสิโน 1988
คาสิโน ทรูวอลเล็ต

 Leave a comment    Posted in Long Posts Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
สิ่งที่ทำให้เกิดการพนันซ้ำและวิธีป้องกัน

The Monster Stack WSOP Event

That is a lot of people!© PokerNews
The 2014 WSOP introduced the concept of the “Monster Stack” tournament, which provides each player with a much larger starting stack than normal.
While it is a well-known fact among professionals that they have a larger edge with a larger stack compared to a smaller stack, the Monster Stack event was one of the largest of the series, attracting a whopping 7,862 players.
When I posted about my confusion on twitter, I was instantly faced with lots of people spewing blatant ignorance. Somehow over the last few years, amateurs got the idea stuck in their head that deep stacks are good for them!
In this blog post, I will explain why the Monster Stack event is bad for amateurs and what they can do to find events that give them the best chance for success.
Before I proceed, please know I am only trying to spread the truth. While it has become clear to me that countless people blindly believe incorrect concepts, if you are an amateur player who cares about money and you seek out deep stacked events consisting of a few professionals, you will quickly find your bankroll is gone.
Playing for Fun
The main reason most amateur players seem to favor deep stacked events is because they allow for “more play.” To them, this means they get to sit at the table for a longer period of time before going broke. This is, of course, correct, because they can lose more hands before becoming handcuffed by a short stack. Compared to normal $1,500 WSOP events, where you are often crippled after losing one marginally significant pot, having a larger stack in terms of big blinds will allow for longer periods of play at the table.
That isn’t a lot of chips!
I want to make it clear that sitting at the table for a long period of time should not be your goal when you enter a poker tournament, assuming you care about money. If you are only playing for entertainment, to complete a “bucket list” item, or for a story to tell your friends, this article is not for you. Those people value experience over money. There is nothing wrong with that at all. However, I try to help people who want to improve at poker, not those who blatantly do not care about knowledge and self-improvement.
In all aspects of life, you can usually find a way to trade money for experience. Most of the time for lunch, I have blended up spinach, kale, parsley, and other vegetables. Yum! However, on some days, I will go out to an overly expensive restaurant and eat fairly unhealthy (compared to raw veggies) food. When I go to a restaurant, I am voluntarily trading money, time, and health for a nice experience and pleasant tastes in my mouth. While I don’t do this too often, perhaps once per week, I enjoy it and will continue to do it.
This guy is clearly having fun.  © PokerListings
I think most amateur poker players who are playing poker for the experience view the Monster Stack event similarly to how I view going out to a fancy restaurant for lunch. There is nothing at all wrong with that. Trying to teach me about nutrition and getting a good value when it comes to dining out at lunch is futile because both of those things are not my goals in the least bit, just like some amateurs’ goals are not to win money in the long run.
I am not on the same page as those players looking for an experience at the poker table because we have vastly different goals. If I want to save money, time, and health, I eat spinach. If I want to spend money, relax, and eat cake, I go to lunch. If you want to maximize your equity, especially if it is certain to be negative (the goal, perhaps, should be to lose less), you should play shallow stacked events. If you want to play poker with the pros, sit at a poker table for a long time, and not instantly go broke, you should play deep stacked events. However, you must realize that you are sacrificing monetary equity for experience equity.
Of course, it is possible to have the best of both worlds, playing deep stacked with an edge, which is what the pros do, but you must accept that you will have to spend tons of time away from the table studying and at the table practicing to develop your skills. Most amateurs refuse to study away from the table and do not have adequate time to spend at the table. If you care about money, you must be realistic with yourself about your goals and your commitment to the game.
My problem occurs when someone tells me “I am playing the monster stack because the deep stack gives me an edge” and also “I play one poker tournament per year.” It is almost impossible for that player to be good at the game.  I am simply being honest and fighting ignorance. Sometimes the truth hurts.
Playing for Money
If you are playing with the intention of trying to not lose your buy-in, you must be perfectly fine with busting out at any point in a tournament. Some of my best days of the summer are when I bust out of within an hour because I get to take the rest of the day off. I would much rather bust one hour into a tournament than eight hours into it, assuming I am not in the money.
It is easy to make bad decisions with a huge stack. © PokerListings
Most amateur players use the extra time afforded to them by having numerous big blinds by waiting around for premium hands. The problem with this is that they often cultivate an overly tight image and fail to get action with their strong holdings. Waiting around for a nut hand is useless if you only win small pots. In order to succeed in deep stacked poker, you have to get at least a touch out of line and let your opponents know you aren’t playing with only the nuts. If they think you are capable of bluffing, you will get paid off much more often.
As an example, in the Monster Stack event, which I made a point to play due to my gigantic perceived edge, someone raised to 3 big blinds and a guy who had yet to reraise over the course of eight hours all of a sudden reraised to 12 big blinds from the button out of his 75 big blind stack. I looked down and found Q-Q. I folded it with little thought.  If my opponent was even the least bit active, I would have happily doubled him up. Instead, I lost nothing. I was not surprised at all to see him turn up A-A. For the record, in tournaments with strong players who play at least marginally aggressively, I don’t think I have ever open folded Q-Q in my life. My opponent’s play cost him around $1,000 in equity and he didn’t even realize it. He was simply happy to win the pot.
Some Math
Lots of other amateurs claimed they don’t like playing short stacked because they are forced to “flip”. While getting it all-in with around 50% equity is never ideal, you will find that if you can get all-in with around 55% equity or more you will crush the competition in the long run. Believe it or not, it is difficult to do once stacks get shallow.
I will demonstrate this concept using oversimplified, but hopefully enlightening, math. In these simulations, you are forced to go all-in every hand in a heads up match. Notice in an actual poker tournament, when you get all-in, it will frequently be against one player, which is a similar situation. You must recognize that if you are overly focused on getting your money in good, you will often be blinding off, making the math much worse for you because when you win, you will not bust your opponents. This gives them the opportunity to run their stack back up, occasionally busting you despite you initially winning almost all of their chips.
Hopefully you know that if everyone has a 50% chance of winning each all-in, in an eight-person heads-up tournament, everyone will win 12.5% of the time. However, if one guy has a 55% chance of winning his flips, meaning each of his opponents has 45% chance against him and 50% against everyone else, the player with 55% will win the tournament a 16.6% of the time, which provides a hefty 32% return on investment. This is because each of his opponents will only win 11.9% of the time.
If instead of only eight people, there were 64, the player with 55% will win 2.77% of the time, which might sound minuscule, but is huge compared to everyone else, who will only win 1.54% of the time. In that event, the player with 55% will have a 77% return on investment, which is more than most top tournament players expect to have in a tournament with many more people. Hopefully you immediately recognize that if you can consistently get your money in good, you will have a larger return on investment as the field size increases.
It is important to realize that when playing deep stacked, good players do not get all-in against an amateur without a hand that can reasonably beat good, but not amazing, postflop hands, such as A-A on 9-7-4-2. It might be hard to believe, but against someone who is a good poker player, you do not want to get all-in with most one pair hands in most situations when you have more than 150 big blinds.
To make matters worse for the amateurs, pros slowly grind up their stacks with minimal risk by stealing lots of pots that do not belong to them. This allows the pros to get all-in as a significant favorite with more chips than their opponents, killing the amateur’s chances in the long run. Notice in a 64 person flipping tournament, if a really good pro has 60% equity and everyone else is neutral, he will win 4.67% of the time with a gigantic 199% return on investment. If instead, all of the stacks are super short, perhaps the best a pro can hope for is to have around 53% equity on average, cutting his return on investment to 41%, giving the amateurs a realistic shot to win in the short run.
This is why deep stacks are devastating for amateurs, assuming they care about money. This is also why you see the same pros making deep runs in major deep stacked events on a consistent basis while they put up less than stellar results in short stacked events. The math is inexorable.
How Did the Amateurs Do in the Monster Stack Event?
If you look up all of the Monster Stack final table players on the Hendon Mob database, you will see that six of the nine players are what I would consider to be mediocre pros or complete pros in the $1,500 and smaller events. Two of the players, including the eventual winner, had almost no live results, but if you take a look at the events they were playing prior to this event, you will notice they were playing mostly high stakes European tournaments. This tells me they are almost certainly strong online players. If you are an online player who plays mostly on the internet and in Europe but you can find a way to come out to beautiful Las Vegas for the WSOP, you are probably excellent at poker. Only one of the players had relatively weak results and even then, he had some.
How did You Do in the Monster Stack Event?
© PokerListings
I got lots of “hate tweets” when I lost, saying that if pros have such a large edge, why didn’t I win? There is a relatively large amount of variance in any poker tournament. How any individual pro fared in the event is entirely irrelevant. You must look at how we did as a whole. Considering that most likely eight out of the nine final table players were at least mediocre pros, we likely did better than average.
That being said, I doubled my 15,000 starting stack to 30,000 without going to a showdown within the first two hours. From there, I got all-in for a giant pot with A-K as an 85% favorite in a spot where I was fairly confident my opponent had A-K, A-Q, or A-J on an A-T-8 board. He had A-Q and got a Q on the river, putting me back to 15,000. I again ground up my stack with no showdown to get to 30,000, and then I lost with A-K versus A-J all-in before the flop to bust. Within a few short hours, I got my money in as an 85% favorite for a two starting stack pot, as a 73% favorite in a four starting stack pot, and I ground up two starting stacks.
I am entirely happy with my performance. The actual outcome (I lost) is irrelevant. Remember, if you are playing poker for a living, you only care about winning equity. Money will come in the long run.
Which Events Should Amateurs Play?
So, which WSOP events should amateurs play, if they are looking for good value for their tournament dollar? They should play events that have the highest variance because those lead to the most flips. This means the typical $1,000 and $1,500 events that have shallow stacks. The Millionaire Maker event is an excellent option for such amateurs looking to play a WSOP event because the stacks are short and the prize pool is huge. If you are looking to gamble hard with at least some equity, that is the event for you. Before buying in, realize you have around a .014% chance of winning, assuming you are a break-even player.
If they play a conservative strategy, they should play events that do not punish being tight with a deep stack. Since pot limit events do not have antes, those are the ideal events for amateurs. Despite this fact, pot limit events attract some of the smallest fields of the series. This is another example of blatant ignorance at work.
My books are a good place to start!
Notice that the WSOP Main Event, which is a giant $10,000 buy-in event, attracts loads of players, and proudly boasts the deepest structure of all events played around the world. This is the one event amateurs should not even consider playing. Instead, they show up in droves.
Of course, the amateurs could spend their time learning the game well before tackling fairly large buy-in events, whatever stack size they provide. That would certainly be a much wiser use of their time and money. Luckily for me, most people find studying to be boring. Poker is alive and well.
Once professionals stop being short-sighted and accept that whatever is good for the amateurs, whether they know it or not, is good for the game, they will fight hard to spread the truth. Sometimes you have to ruffle a few feathers and viciously attack ignorance along the way. I am willing to fight the fight.
Thank you for reading. If you have any comments at all, feel free to share them.

.

คาสิโน ออนไลน์888
ทางเข้า คาสิโน
คาสิโน 1688
คาสิโน 1988
คาสิโน ทรูวอลเล็ต

 Leave a comment    Posted in Long Posts Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
รีวิวการเดิมพันแอ ธ เลติก Bibao VS Getafe

What to Do Versus a Big River Bet (3 Simple Tips)

This article was written by blackrain79.com contributor Fran Ferlan.

Playing the river optimally is what makes or breaks your winrate. 

It’s the biggest money street and you often have to make a decision for your
whole stack. The amount of money in the pot by the river often paralyzes
players, because they are overly focused on the pot size, which affects their
decision making process. 

So what should you do versus a big river bet? Well, when you ask a broad
question, you tend to get a broad answer, so here it is: it depends.

There’s a lot of factors to consider here: your opponent type, previous
action, board runout, pot odds, your relative hand strength, just to name a
few.

Not a huge help, so let’s try to break it down in this article.

1. Try to Bluff Catch Versus Loose and Aggressive Players

Let’s start with the type of player we are up against. Most players will
primarily bet for value when they fire off a big river bet, especially at the
micros. 

The only exception would be loose and aggressive players. This is true for
both regulars and aggrofish. You can generally call wider against aggrofish
than you would against LAG regulars. The looser and more aggressive the
player, the wider you should call them down. 

This is an advanced poker strategy that works extremely well in today’s small stakes games. BlackRain79 discusses it in more detail in this video:
So in practice, this means that sometimes you should call them down with hands
you wouldn’t be comfortable calling with otherwise, like top pair weak kicker,
second pair, two pair on a wet board and such. 

It’s important to trust your judgment in these situations, otherwise you’re
better off folding earlier if you suspect you’re going to get barrelled and
pushed out of the pot. 

However, just because someone is loose and aggressive, doesn’t mean they will
have only bluffs in their range, especially on the river.

The board runout is an important factor when deciding how wide you should
call. Generally speaking, the drier the board, the wider you can bluff
catch. 

Why? 

Because your opponent sees the same community cards you see, and if they bet
huge on the river, they’re basically saying that the board doesn’t scare them
and they don’t care what you are holding. 

On the other hand, if the river bricks (i.e. a river card doesn’t change
anything significantly, because it fails to complete any straight or flush
draws, for example), your more observant opponents might put you on a busted
draw and try to bluff you out of the pot. 

They can also have a busted draw of their own, as decently winning LAGs know
the power of semibluffing on earlier streets, and know a large majority of
their opponents won’t have the heart to call down their triple barrel without
a monster hand.

In this situation, you should look for an opportunity to bluff catch with your
top pair or second pair, for example. Bear in mind that this isn’t something
you should try to do often, as these kinds of situations are more of an
exception than the rule, but who doesn’t love a good hero call from time to
time?

If you’re able to pick off a huge pot with a mediocre hand, it can do wonders
to your bottom line, as most players wouldn’t have the nerve to pull it
off. 

It will also make it more difficult to play against you, because you’ll show
that you are able to call down in less than ideal circumstances, and won’t be
pushed around. 

Just a disclaimer: 

Know that it’s a high-risk, high reward play, and should be attempted only in
specific circumstances, against specific opponents, on specific boards and
against specific previous action. 

You should base it on sound information and tells you’ve picked up on, not
just the feeling that this guy is bluffing, I’m gonna call him down with my
Ace-high.

Big River Bet Example Hand #1

Effective stack size: 100BB.

You are dealt A♦8♦ in the BB.

A LAG reg open-raises to 3x from the BU.
SB folds, you call.

Pot: 6.5BB.

Flop: T♣7♠6♥

You check. Villain bets 3BB. You call.

Pot: 12.5BB.

Turn: 2♣
You check. Villain bets 6BB. You call.

Pot: 24.5BB.

River: A♠
You check. Villain bets 16BB.

You: ???

You should call.

This is a great spot to bluff catch based on our opponent type, previous
action, and the board runout. Let’s break it down.

A loose and aggressive reg open raises from the button. We assume their range
is very wide here, probably close to 50% of all hands. We have a decent
speculative hand. We can even opt to 3-bet light from time to time, but we
decide to flat call.

We flop a gutshot straight draw, and we expect the villain to fire off a c-bet
with pretty much a 100% of their range, which he does.

The turn doesn’t change much for us, except it puts a possible flush draw on
the board. The villain double barrels, but since not much has changed for us
from flop to turn, and are getting about 3:1 odds on a call, we decide to
continue.

The river doesn’t complete our gutshot, but we do end up improving to a top
pair. Is it good enough for a call? Let’s look at it from the villain’s
perspective. 

We didn’t give him any reason to assume we are holding an Ace. In fact, we
checked three times, so if they had to put us on a range, they would assume we
have a Tx hand, a busted straight or a flush draw. 

Conveniently, that’s a part of their perceived range as well. The river comes
with a scare card, so it wouldn’t be a surprise if they tried to buy the pot
there.

Are we going to be good a hundred percent of the time? Of course not, but we
don’t need to be. This is something that BlackRain79 talks about in Modern Small Stakes.

They have a significant amount of bluffs in their range for our call to be
+EV, considering their player type, their open-raising position, our passive
lines, non-coordinated board and so on. 

When we take all of that into consideration, we can infer that we can call
profitably.

As for the aggrofish, aka complete maniacs, you can widen your river calling
ranges considerably. It is also a high risk, high reward play, but these
players are the only ones that will have a significant amount of bluffs on the
river. 

Why? 

Because their ranges are already extremely wide on previous streets, so it’s
fair to assume they will get to the river with all kinds of busted draws,
Ace-high hands, fourth pair etc.

While their aggression can certainly be profitable in the short term, as even
they can occasionally catch a monster hand, they will be the most significant
long term losers. 

You can’t outrun math. So when playing against them, you should be making more
hero calls than you would usually be inclined. 

Be aware that their maniacal ways are usually short-lived, so you should try
to get them to donate their stacks to you before the next guy. 

And you usually won’t have the luxury of waiting around for the monster hand
to try and trap them. 

So next time you find yourself facing a huge river bet against them, go with
your gut, take a deep breath and call them down. Your winrate will thank you
for it.

Make $500+ Per Month in Low Stakes Poker Games With My Free Poker Cheat Sheet

Are you having trouble consistently beating low stakes poker games online or live? Are you looking to make a consistent part time income playing these games?

 That is why I wrote this free little 50 page poker cheat sheet to give you the exact strategies to start consistently making $500 (or more) per month in low stakes poker games right now. These are the exact poker strategies by the way that I used to create some of the highest winnings in online poker history at the lower limits, as a 10+ year poker pro. And I lay them all out for you step by step in this free guide.

Enter your details below and I will send my free poker cheat sheet to your inbox right now.

2. Look for Possible Completed Draws

As far as all the other player types are concerned, like fish who aren’t of
the aggro persuasion (which is most of them) and TAGs, you should be very
careful when calling big river bets. This is especially the case if they donk
bet big into you. (A donk bet is a bet made against the previous streets’
aggressor). 

Look for possible completed draws and ask yourself if their previous action
makes sense that way. If the answer is yes, your overpair or top two pair
probably isn’t good enough anymore. 

Think of it this way: would you bet big out of position on the river against
someone’s previous incessant aggression without a really strong hand? You
probably wouldn’t. And neither would the majority of the player pool at the
micro stakes. 

Big River Bet Example Hand #2

Effective stack size: 100BB.
You are dealt A♠Q♠ on the BU.

You open-raise to 3x.
SB folds, a loose passive fish calls in the BB.

Pot: 6.5BB

Flop: A♦3♦Q♥

Fish checks. You bet 5BB. Fish calls.

Pot: 16.5BB

Turn: 8♣
Fish checks. You bet 16.5BB. Fish calls.

Pot: 49.5

River: J♦

Fish bets 40BB.
You: ???

You should fold.

Let’s break down the action street by street.

There’s not much to say about preflop. We’re dealt a great hand on the button,
and we can assume the recreational player will call us down pretty wide in the
big blind.

We flop top two pair and should start building the pot as soon as possible. We
expect to get called by a bunch of Ax hands, gutshot straight draws, flush
draws, you name it.

The turn doesn’t change much, but it does add a couple of gutshot draws if our
opponent called the flop with hands like JT, J9, or T9, for example. 

We’re still miles ahead of villain’s range, so we decide to charge them a
premium for their drawing hands. We can even consider overbettting, but we go
for a pot sized bet.

And we get one of the worst river cards possible. The fish fires off a huge
donk bet. There is nothing left for us to do but bemoan our luck and fold
begrudgingly. 

The Jack on the river completes a number of straight draws and a flush draw.
If we go back to preflop, we should expect this particular opponent to have
practically all suited junk in their range. 

Fish love chasing draws, and they love playing suited junk. Nevermind the fact
that the chances of flopping a flush are only 0.8%.

Now, we could argue that it’s a fish, they don’t know what they’re doing, they
could be bluffing. Or they could have any number of two pair hands we’re ahead
of. Fair enough.

But if they did have a two pair hand, for example, wouldn’t they go for a
check-call option, considering such a scary board? 

Even fish can see three diamonds on a board. And yes, they could be bluffing,
but there is nothing in their previous history that would suggest that.

You should always be on the lookout for disrupting patterns when playing
poker. 

If an otherwise weak and timid opponent suddenly starts blasting off big bets,
they didn’t just randomly decide to mix it up a little. They are politely
letting you know they have the nuts.

As a rule of thumb in poker in general, calling should be the last option you
consider. As the old adage goes, if your hand is good enough for a call, it’s
good enough for a raise.

3. Check Your HUD Stats to Make an Informed Decision

But how do you know what type of player you’re up against? Well, the most
accurate way would be to check their VPIP (voluntarily put money in pot), PFR
(preflop raise) and AF (aggression factor) in your poker tracking software HUD.These are statistics which are placed right on your online poker table, beside each of your opponents, which tell you what type of player you are up against. This is highly useful information to have especially in the fast paced, multi-tabling, world of online poker. 

These three poker HUD stats alone can give you a pretty good idea of the type of player you’re
facing, and only after a hundred hands or so. Of course, the bigger the sample
size, the better, but you can draw some general conclusions pretty
quickly. 

However, as we all know, most hands don’t get to showdown, and while we can
make some wide generalizations about some player types, it’s better to have
more info than less. If you are using a HUD, you might want to consider adding
stats like WWSF, WTSD, and W$SD to accurately assess your opponent’s postflop
tendencies.
By the way, if you aren’t using a poker HUD yet, BlackRain79 shows you how to set up your HUD in less than 5 minutes in this video:

So, WWSF stands for Won When Saw Flop, and is a percentage of times a player won
the pot after seeing the flop. The lower the WWSF, the weaker the player,
meaning they play aggressively with very strong hands only, and conversely,
the higher the WWSF, the more they bluff and fight for the pot post flop.

Here is a rough estimation of the spectrum.Use These Specific HUD Stats to Make Optimal Decisions Versus a Big River Bet

If their WWSF is less than 42%, they are weak and give up too much post flop. They don’t bluff enough, and if they give you action, especially on the big
money streets (turn and river) they have a very strong hand.

WWSF between 42% and 52% is the average. Of course, the higher the number, the
more often they bluff.

If their WWSF is bigger than 52%, they bluff way too often. You can call them
down widely and use their aggression against them.

WTSD stands for Went to Showdown, and shows the % of times a player, well,
went to showdown.

A player with a WTSD below 20% is an extreme nit, and goes to showdown with
very strong hands only.

A WTSD between about 24% and 27% is the norm for most winning players. Players with a WTSD above 30% are huge calling stations, and you should value
bet them relentlessly.

W$SD or Won Money at Showdown (or WSD) indicates the % of times a player won
the pot after the showdown. It’s inversely proportional to the WTSD, i.e. a
player with a low WTSD will have a big W$SD because they only see the showdown
with very strong hands, and huge calling stations will have a low W$SD because
they call down with a bunch of garbage hands.

Nitty players will have a W$SD of about 60% or more, fishy players about 40%
or less. Solid winning players will therefore be right in the middle with
about 50%.

One very important caveat, these stats require a huge sample size in order to
be accurate. 

You will need 500 hands at the bare minimum to make any informed assumptions.
1000 hands is a decent sample size, but they get really accurate only after
5000 hands or so.

Needless to say, the more they tend towards the extremes of the spectrum, the
less hands you need to be sure, and the more you can exploit them by either
overbluffing or betting for value, depending on which side they fall.
If you want to learn much more about all these HUD stats make sure you check out BlackRain79’s popular optimal HUD setup guide.

Summary

In order to play the river effectively, you need to take into account a number
of factors, including, but not limited to: the pot odds, your relative hand
strength, board runout, type of opponent you’re up against, previous action
and so on.

You basically have to apply all of your theoretical knowledge at the same
time. While it may seem daunting at first, the more you practice, the more
automatic the process will become, and after a while you’ll be able to put
your opponents on correct ranges, maybe even zero in on their exact hand.

It will certainly take a great deal of practice, because as we know, most
hands don’t even get to showdown, and river spots are so rare and unique that
it’s hard to even try to answer what to do in these spots in a single article.

However, there are some general guidelines you should adhere to:

First of all, big river bets usually indicate a strong made hand, especially
at the micros. Most players will bet for value, and aren’t really inclined to
risk a significant portion of their stack without something to back it up.

The only exception would be loose and aggressive players, and maybe some solid
tight and aggressive players who know what they’re doing, and know that a well
timed aggression can go a long way. 

But again, these are quite rare at the micros.

So against LAGs, you should try to bluff catch from time to time if you
believe they have a significant amount of bluffs in their range. 

Just bear in mind that it’s a high variance play, so be prepared to take it in
stride when they actually had the nuts all along.

Against aggrofish (aka maniac fish) you should widen your river calling ranges
significantly, and be prepared to call them down with less than ideal
holdings. 

Don’t wait around for a monster hand, because these don’t come along as often,
and try to take their stack before the next guy. 

Lastly, if an otherwise weak and timid player starts making huge bets, your
top pair hand probably isn’t good enough anymore. 

Look for completed draws and assume they have it. Make a disciplined laydown
and live to fight another day. 

One bonus tip, be sure to practice hand history review off the felt. Filter
for the hands that went to showdown, and try to narrow your opponent’s range
street by street. 

Talk to yourself out loud and tell yourself all the information you have. This
will sharpen your decision-making skills in-game, and you’ll be able to
accurately assess your opponent’s ranges in no time. 

You’ll be able to read souls, make all kinds of huge laydowns and hero calls
like a pro. Just remember, practice makes perfect.

.

บ่อน คาสิโน
สล็อต คาสิโน ออนไลน์
เกมรอยัล คาสิโน
คาสิโน ฟรีเครดิต 2020
เกม คาสิโน ปอยเปต

 Leave a comment    Posted in river bet Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,